There are archived threads addressing this subject. I have tried both ways (plus all-tube and all-SS), but I won't make generalizing statements, because my experiences only apply to the gear that I used, not all such combinations. I will say that using SS preamplification can give a lower noise floor than tubes, a possible advantage you seem not to have considered. IMO, the tube pre/SS amp combo is the more popular alternative, but right now I am running the reverse combo with excellent results (though my latest gear is the highest-end I've yet gone in both departments). As usual, SS seems to have all the theoretical advantages on paper, whether for preamplification or power amplification - all, that is, except often for the sound... :-)
SS Preamp+valve Amp vs Valve Preamp+SS Amp
Hi, I have been wondering for quite a while as what would be the sonic differences between (1)SS Preamp+ Valve Amp
(2) Valve Preamp+ SSAmp . I can only think of the benefit of (2)is smoother highs and better bass-slam.I just don't understand the philosophy behind (1)-(one of the company reportedly using Pure Class A design for the preamp section,while using 2 ESL34 per channel for the output. what would be the sonic advantages of it? ). Your opinion and suggestion is highly appreciated and thanks in advance
Simon
(2) Valve Preamp+ SSAmp . I can only think of the benefit of (2)is smoother highs and better bass-slam.I just don't understand the philosophy behind (1)-(one of the company reportedly using Pure Class A design for the preamp section,while using 2 ESL34 per channel for the output. what would be the sonic advantages of it? ). Your opinion and suggestion is highly appreciated and thanks in advance
Simon
3 responses Add your response