SQ or performance?


In classical music, how much does the sound quality influence your enjoyment of a particular piece?  I find it plays a large part. A recording is an artifact in itself.  There are many factors which contribute to the final product. And even a great performance can be sabotaged by poor engineering, poor pressing, poor microphone placement and the like. Conversely, a mediocre performance can be attractive to us because of sterling acoustics.   
In “historical” recordings we may allow for bad sound, but in contemporary performances the sound can have  a significant bearing on our perspective.
Also, our appreciation of a given performance can be affected by other factors.  For example, if we grew up loving a certain version, all others may suffer by comparison in our view.
 

 

rvpiano

Showing 2 responses by frogman

This question has been asked a thousand times in different ways and with different wording. Of course we all want the best possible sound quality; this doesn’t need debate. However, I think that the real question is how much does the listener rely on great sound in order to appreciate a great performance. How much of a “distraction” from the music are we willing to let the less than great sound be? Barring absolutely horrid recorded sound the musical merits of a great performance will shine through to one degree or another. Usually, to a great degree; that is the power of great music.

Personally, I think that many listeners are way to quick to declare a great recorded performance “unlistenable” because of less than great sound. I think that this is unfortunate. Of course, as bdp24 comments “it depends” on just how bad the sound is. However, I have found that there are relatively few recordings that do so much damage to the music that it keeps me from appreciating the brilliance of a great performance. Perhaps not fully, but close enough to know that I’m listening to a great artist.

It always comes down to this other way of asking the question (and, yes, we can be both, but….): are we a music lover first, or a sound lover first?

 

**** But sound quality dont hold a candle to musical interpretation...****
 

Not much more to add.  Great posts, mahgister.

Since the subject is Classical music I will add that sometimes what is perceived as great sound is actually artificial sound.  Classical music composers do not and did not intend their music to be heard with the kind of hyper detail and spotlighting often heard on some recordings.  Impressive sound perhaps…..in a way.  However, composers compose and choose certain instrumental combinations with the idea in mind that only from a certain distance the listener would hear the desired blend of instrumental colors and textures.  The pin point imaging and detail that is sometimes craved by listeners actually destroys the composer’s intent for the composition.  A classic case of less is more and why some feel that their stereos sound better than a live performance in a decent hall.  An absurdity, imo.