Being a late-comer to this thread and having read most of its contents I must point out that the original question will engender many alternatives to the oft-mentioned Bose variants. True, given the retrospection of the last 30 years or so, there are MANY systems which would be preferable to the sensitive listener. But, even given its many weaknesses, the 901s produce a more realistic illusion than the almost limitless versions of the hollow, cardboard-walled box. Listen to current KLH creations, or any Cerwin-Vega (solidly built but how unnatural) etc....and these are well known brand names. During the early '70s I worked for a high-end shop to supplement my income as a musician.One day we were gathered to hear something new. Amir Bose was there to demonstrate his 901s. A dedicated room was set up with the 901s suspended from the ceiling. The system was fed by a reel-to-reel playing a tape supplied by Dr. Bose. This tape demonstrated various single instruments and ensembles. I must say that at that time, the results were very impressive. Especially the illusion of space and timbre. There was really nothing quite like it at the time. Bear in mind that these 901s were presumably optimized in their setup (Most of you will probably admit that you haven't heard 901s well setup, especially in the typical mass-market scenario where they are typically sold now). Now, I'm not claiming that the 901s are outstanding in any way given today's competition. But there are still many midpriced and lower box-systems which don't present as satifying an illusion. I should also add that I've never owned any Bose product. Finally, we should remember that the presumed goal for this hobby is the enjoyment of music (hardware is of course, a valid interest in and of itself). And that Bose products are purchased and enjoyed by numbers of listeners which would be the envy of many so-called high-end mfrs. PS: Although I've had quite a few fast-food hamburgers in my time, I also cannot appreciate the paint-by-light fellow. De gustibus non est disputandum.
