Erik:
Thank you for sharing that link.
I believe the article is fascinating on several levels. Thank you for possibly one of the most thought provoking posts (IMO obviously) of the year.
I happen to find pleasure using several older B&W matrix series speakers. 802,804,805 etc In different settings around the home. I like their sound, I run them with Bryston power, and various sources. It pleases me, not trying to say it’s perfect. (Use what pleases YOUR ears, not here to push an agenda)
B&W btw has web access to see their crossovers for all their models in Service Manuals. On my two way 805 for example there is a far more sophisticated crossover than the two way analyzed in the linked article from Eric.
It would be fascinating to speak “off the record” to the people who made the decisions regarding crossover choices in the model reviewed.
Would they say:
1) Cost drove the decision?
2) Some version of “Played side by side with competing speakers in typical show rooms, polls of unsophisticated listeners prefer this sound”
3) If we put in a proper crossover, even with inexpensive components, it would sound SO good, people wouldn’t buy the more expensive line of speakers.
4) We think it sounds great this way, why change it?
Personally I find it surprising they use (apparently) very good quality drivers, but hamstring (again, apparently) the crossover.
I think the least likely explanation is that B&W actually thinks it sounds “better” than with a more appropriate crossover..... so it begs the question why?
The ironic part of this discussion is that B&W are not stupid collectively as a company. Odds are likely that the majority of us in this forum, if charged with making the decision of how to release this particular speakers crossover, might actually AGREE with B&W decision once the true reasons were revealed.
(ie Porsche knows it’s SUV are a dilution of their core product, but to survive and produce their “good stuff” they essentially have no choice.)
Thank you for sharing that link.
I believe the article is fascinating on several levels. Thank you for possibly one of the most thought provoking posts (IMO obviously) of the year.
I happen to find pleasure using several older B&W matrix series speakers. 802,804,805 etc In different settings around the home. I like their sound, I run them with Bryston power, and various sources. It pleases me, not trying to say it’s perfect. (Use what pleases YOUR ears, not here to push an agenda)
B&W btw has web access to see their crossovers for all their models in Service Manuals. On my two way 805 for example there is a far more sophisticated crossover than the two way analyzed in the linked article from Eric.
It would be fascinating to speak “off the record” to the people who made the decisions regarding crossover choices in the model reviewed.
Would they say:
1) Cost drove the decision?
2) Some version of “Played side by side with competing speakers in typical show rooms, polls of unsophisticated listeners prefer this sound”
3) If we put in a proper crossover, even with inexpensive components, it would sound SO good, people wouldn’t buy the more expensive line of speakers.
4) We think it sounds great this way, why change it?
Personally I find it surprising they use (apparently) very good quality drivers, but hamstring (again, apparently) the crossover.
I think the least likely explanation is that B&W actually thinks it sounds “better” than with a more appropriate crossover..... so it begs the question why?
The ironic part of this discussion is that B&W are not stupid collectively as a company. Odds are likely that the majority of us in this forum, if charged with making the decision of how to release this particular speakers crossover, might actually AGREE with B&W decision once the true reasons were revealed.
(ie Porsche knows it’s SUV are a dilution of their core product, but to survive and produce their “good stuff” they essentially have no choice.)