Sourcing a top of the line Jvc mm

Dover, ''I have a mint JVC X-I-mk2 - never used it - overrated.'' This is the most

curious statement you ever made. 

best groove, to judge if you like, say, Chinese opera, you need to hear one and

in addition someone who will explain  to you that what you hear IS OPERA.

Well Dover is Kant's  follower with A PRIORI knowledge, He knew that JVC

which he never used is ''OVERRATED''. 

My ''dispute'' with Dover is not without ''some'' of my own interest. Those

apply for my past my present and, hopeful  a long future.

I intend to llist my NOS (= aka never heard) JVC X-1 ,mk2 on ebay very

soon. Among other of my 'poor' in comaprisson with dover analog stuff.

Despite my above expressed hope I am busy with my inheritance . 

The  native speakers English have ''easy way out'' by any ''dispute'' by 

referring to their assumed command of English or /and English grammar.

What is an foreigner assumed to replay? Well some of them can

refer to their knowledge of logic which is superioer to English

grammar. English grammar is very simple. It can be reduced to the formula:

''X is P'' . In place of the variable X one can put whatever ''subject'' one

like  and add some predicate as ''description of X'' . Whomever does not believe

this should try to formulate  whatever English sentennce without this formula.

The case in casu is Dovers statement: '' I have a a mint JVC-X1-mk2- never

used it- overrated''

From this statement it is not possible to deduce that he used the cart before.

Instead to refer to my lack of understanding of function of tima or his ''past tense'' 

he only  needed to add the word ''anymore'' . This has nothing to do with

grammar but well with the right choise of words. 

''Anymore'' would imply that he used JVC before. 

iI also got ''reprimand '' from soneone stating  ''your English is obvious second

language''' With obvous .intention. My answer was that English is my 5th

langugage and never heard reply from this person. 

My assumption is that our forum is discussion forum. . This may mean (grin)

that members put their ARGUMENTS in writing and expect reaction of

OTHER members. Not from the same persons involved in ''welles Welles

Wells''. I mentionedl logical  argument you  still repeit grammar arguemt

about ''past tense'' and ''present tense''. My other argument was that if 

you had added the word '' anymore'' your statment would be more clear

in bothe ''tens'' or time reading. But this word has nothing to with grammar

It is simple  LACKING. 

But to expecti from you ''confession'' that you was wrong is not possible.

Anyway I can remember one single case.