Soundstage, layering and tube differences


Within tube types, say el34’s, can anyone explain why one brand of tube like SED C’s have deep layered soundstaging and another, such as the Mullard reissue el34’s ,are more 2D? I just replaced my 10 year old SED’s with the Mullards ( which still need burn-in), but they are not nearly as 3D in my amps and are reported to be such.
Do some tubes resolve the actual recorded room acoustics better or is it a matter of harmonic distortion giving the illusion of soundstaging and 3 dimensionality??
jim94025

Showing 1 response by jjss49

you call burn in whatever you want

any electrical device, connection, circuit, will ’settle in’ over some time...whether it is seconds, minutes, hours, days... it has to do with physics of matter, electrical flow, heat/heat dissipation

w.r.t. tubes, they definitely have different sonic characteristics (frequency, amplitude, and phase differences)... not to mention your equipment interacting with the tube (driver and buffer circuits, components within those circuits), transformers, power supplies... each design/component operates as a system... nothing works in isolation