Sonus faber Amati vs Amati

I have -- but, I'm afraid, I never noticed this difference in dynamics between Cremona & Amati... if anything, the Amati would be my choice. However, I wouldn't attribute this to "dynamics" per se but, rather, to a better rendition of scale as in reproduction of a fff.

In how big a room will you be playing these spkrs?
The Amati are "big" and the latest version seem to need even more room than the previous ones...

As to the new Amati vs the old, I haven't compared them side by side unfortunately so, tenpted though I may be to opt for the new, don't give too much credence to my choice.

Last, I find the Cremona a nice product and OK priced (by SF stratospheric standards). The Amati is expensive. By comparison, the Strad -- an interesting implementation -- is not only better but much better value. (IMO, YMMV, etc ad nauseam.)
Cheers

Well, from Mozart to Mahler and beyond, the present Amati is OK (I assure you the Strad is better by far -- but much TOO big for yr application anyway. BTW, the new Amati is +20k euro, not cheap).

As I said, I *think* the new Amati version is more correct than the previous one: it is staccato with a good sense of naturalness and not so much honey in the lower midrange. It can handle the scale of a large orch in satisfactory manner.

Playing the Amati in a small room is possible, anything is. BUT, you'll be listening at low volume otherwise room modes will create inconsistencies below say 200Hz. The room sounds very damped to me, so if you equalise the Amati, give it a more or less flat response.
For best results, move into the new room soon; as you've doubtless noticed, it's a large speaker!