Someone just dropped cash into your lap


If you suddenly came upon a financial windfall (you determine the ammount) but could only spend it in one of two places; source, or speakers, where would you put it and why?
nrchy

Showing 3 responses by ozfly

That's a tough one. If you define source very broadly as anything in the chain prior to the speakers, I'd pick source. Specifically, I'd dramatically upgrade cables, analog and pre-amp. I know I'm cheating a bit here, but that's where my system is weakest. The Montana KAS and Sierra Denali amps are very nice and I can live with them for a long while (we'll see). My cabling needs serious help but I'm waiting until I move into my new house and unpack my system before trying new combinations.

So, to answer your question, I would put money into those areas I have not been putting major bucks into before. As many have stated, "more money" does not always equal "better system", but I think it would take some cash to find the right combination and there are several areas of focus: Pre-amp (tube) at $5-$10k, cables (front to back) at $2-$15k, analog (turntable, arm, cartridge, phono-amp) at $10-25k. I'm drooling already. Too bad great analog is so pricey. Oh, and if source includes album, cd and sacd purchases, well -- let's go ahead and add $10-20k there. I'll be happy to let anyone know where they may send a check for $50-70k if you e-mail me. Thanks in advance.
To answer the question a little less tongue in cheek, my very first priority would be a set of 5 meter XLR interconnects between preamp and amps. I need to do a lot of research before I can determine which would be best.

Pops, I have the MIT Oracle V2 speaker cables and really enjoy them. The 1.1's would be awesome! (depending on system and tastes, of course)
Kelton, that's the spirit! If you're going to dream ... Dixie chicks and German wine!!!