Some thoughts on dust covers


Over the course of time there have been many discussions concerning the subject of dust covers.  They tend to revolve around the central question:  Should the dust cover be down or up while playing records?  Some of these discussions have been nasty, consequently I have refrained from participation.  It is hoped that I can provide some common sense that was given to me by someone of unquestioned authority many years ago.  During college and after, from 1970 to ~1980 I worked in HiFi retail, selling high end lines of audio equipment.  One of these lines was Thorens.  Sometime around 1977 or 1978, if memory serves, Thorens introduced their new TD126, as a top of the line TT with their own arm and I sold the first one at our store to very good customer.  He came back very unhappy after the first night of frustration with it.  The problem was that with the dust cover closed some of his favorite records were hitting tangentally on the very back were the platter came closest to the dust cover when it was in the closed position.  I called the manufacturer's rep and he set up a three cornered phone call with himself, the Chief Engineer of Thorens at the time, and me.  I don't recall the man's name, but it doesn't matter, it is what he said that matters, then and now.  The Chief Engineer explained that the problem was caused because the hole in the offending records was slightly off center so there was an eccentricity as such a record rotates about the spindle.  The solution was simplicity itself, the dust cover should be removed always when playing records.  That the intent of the cover is to protect the turntable when not in use.  I pointed out that we lived in a semi-arrid environment (San Diego, CA) which is dusty to which he replied that if the environment was too dusty for records it should also be considered unhealthy for people to be breathing the air.  He recommended are filtration, not dust covers to address environmental concerns.  The rep asked about air bourne feedback from speakers and the Thorens guy laughed and said that if that was a problem in a given system, relying of the dust cover was a very flimsy and ineffective solution and that proper measures should be instituted to provide meaningful distance and isolation to ameliorate the problem.   So the often offered extremes:  a) Always play your records with the dust cover down, or b) put the dust cover away in it's box and never use it, should both be recognized for what they are are - not solutions at all.  First principles:  Identify the problem(s), seek solutions and alternatives, prioritize.

billstevenson

Showing 2 responses by terraplane8bob

I haven't seen it addressed so far in this discussion so I'll relate an experience I had back in the late 60s / early 70s when visiting my favorite audio emporium.  The owner kept a very orderly showroom and a regular dusting of the display components helped keep it that way.  On one visit, the owner took me aside to show me a discovery he accidently made while on his dusting routine.  If memory serves, I believe the turntable in question was a DUAL 1019 and the cartridge was a SHURE V-15.  He played a record with the dustcover down, ran his dusting cloth over the plastic lid and the playback sound changed considerably.  He then produced a "ZeroStat", a pistol-shaped device that was used to de-magnetize vinyl reccords prior to playing and activated it over the dustcover.  The playback sound returned to its previous character.  If I hadn't seen and heard it I wouldn't have believed it possible !  The dusting cloth had magnetized the dust cover enough to cause the tonearm to lighten up its tracking force and the ZeroStat dispersed the magnetic field to restore it to its original tracking force !  I never tried to duplicate the feat at home and had no reason to believe that the owner was playing a trick on me, so, to this day, I play my TT with no dustcover in place.  Was he trying to get me to buy a ZeroStat ?  I dunno, but I did buy one and still use it on occasion !

My-O-My !  I never expected to kick up so much "dust" with my re-telling of the story of when my audio dealer dusted his turntable dust cover and created enough magnetism to alter the stylus force !

Perhaps we can end it all simply by turning our attention to another interesting thing I noticed on my 1920's Victor "Credenza".  On the lowest portion of the rather sizeable and heavy lid is a decal that states, "Close Lid Whilst Playing".  Since it was effectively the turntable dust cover, I hope to stay within the confines of the original post.   There definitely is a difference in the quality of sound when following the directions though I've never decided whether it was a diminution of the very noticeable stylus "scratch" or a real enhancement of the sound as a result of confining the sound box to a more restrictive acoustic.  Victor even encouraged the regimen of closing the lid by providing the lid with two "dashpots" which damp the lid closure enough to prevent any slamming effect.  On the Columbia "360" record player from the 1950's, the edges of the lid were lined with felt so that when the lid was closed it definitely created a different acoustic situation in which the cartridge had to function. The Speakers were located on the opposite sides of the unit and one driver was purposely wired "out of phase" to create a diffusive effect.   Later models of the "360", though much more modern in the cabinet design, went even more deeply into the idea of encapsulating the cartridge in its own acoustic by integrating a fully sealed plastic container within the player to isolate the cartridge even more fully than the original model.  You almost have to pry the lid to open it !

My question is :  Were there any modern turntables that had a dust cover/lid that was designed purposely to be closed during the play cycle to take advantage [?] of the difference between an open or closed acoustic surrounding the cartridge ? Some of us have certainly experienced acoustic feedback when positioning a loudspeaker too close to a sensitive turntable that created an acoustic feedback through the cartridge, so the reasoning follows that attention to the acoustic in which a cartridge must function is important.

I own both an early and late Columbia "360" machine and there are mono records that sound like fine stereo recordings on these machines !  Amazing !!   The outer lids on both the Victrola and the Columbia "360' machines were of wood so they could not be magnetized.  Thoughts ?   Experiences ?