Soeaker cables technologic dilema…


We have two technological solutions when it comes to speaker cable: 
 
1. Four wires (2 on + and 2 on -), twisted in a star quad, in a screened braid and in one collective insulation.

2. Second solution: two SEPARATE double-wire cables, one for + and one for -, but without shield. 


The number of cores, core cross-section, material, weave, both in NES-3003-G and NES-3005-G everything is the same. 
 
In the first solution we have a screen, and in the second solution we have a separation of plus and minus. 
 
How will it be better? What to expect?
milimetr

@squared80 Well, there's no equipment listed in your profile so I guess we can only assume you speak from experience.

"Solutions? Solutions to what? Increasing margins for snake oil companies? This cable won't be any better than a coat hanger. I guarantee you would never know the difference in a blind test."

 

 

@milimetr 

We have two technological solutions when it comes to speaker cable

Your opening statement ignores the hundreds of speaker cable designs on the market.  If you want us to hypothetically compare just two designs from the one company, best say so!

Two solutions to consider in this particular case.
I think that it is obvious, but not for everyone as I can see… 

Post removed