I don't any experience with the Cambridge 840W but do have experience bridging a pair of Pathos Classic One MK III integrated amps. I read the reviews of both amps (bridged) at Dagogo by Doug Schroeder. Since you didn't ask about the Pathos amps, I won't bore you with too much detail about them but suffice it to say that bridging seemed to bring everything significantly closer which made it far easier to hear detail clearly which had been previously obscured or merely hinted at. The only downside I heard was a diminished sense of depth. The furthest sounds now seemed more immediate thus the acoustical environment seemed foreshortened. All in all, I would consider that a fair trade.
single Cambridge audio azur 840w vs bridged mono
Hi,
i have the azur 840w in stereo mode, i like the way he sound but i would like to have much more detail and focus.
I dont know if i need the extra power but i want better sound quality.
My speaker is dynaudio contour s5.4.
What can i get if i buy another 840w for a bridged mono application(no bi wiring on the speakers).
thank you
i have the azur 840w in stereo mode, i like the way he sound but i would like to have much more detail and focus.
I dont know if i need the extra power but i want better sound quality.
My speaker is dynaudio contour s5.4.
What can i get if i buy another 840w for a bridged mono application(no bi wiring on the speakers).
thank you