SET the best?


Is SET amplification where we should all end up? I keep reading posts where people tell of their journeys from plenty power to micro power, and how amazing SET amplification is 45 set 211 set 845 set otl, and usually, ....with the right speaker. I have yet to read of anyone who has gone the other direction from SET, to High watt beast class A amps or others.
If your speakers can be driven by minimal wattage, is this the most realistic, natural sound we can achieve? versus say, 86db sensitive speakers and a 1000w amp?
Is the end result solely based on speaker pairing? circuit? tubes?

I am in the process of changing my direction in my search for realistic sound, just because, and wondering if this really is the best direction to be going.
From what I have been reading I think it may be.

What do we get with SET? What do we give up?

What's you favorite color?
hanaleimike

Showing 1 response by sibelius

I've been a SET convert for about a decade. I have no desire to go back to Solid State. While the limitations of SET are well known (low end frequency can't match SS, Need efficient speakers) I think their strengths (mid range magic, unbelievable presence, non-fatiguing sound) are worth any inconvenience. I have 3 SET amps (300B, 2A3, 45) and they each have their own special sound. I love using the 300B with Orchestral or more complex music, 2A3 with Jazz, and 45 with chamber music or simple vocals. SET amps are also very sensitive to tube changes so you can fiddle to your heart's content in tailoring the sound to your liking. I think everyone who loves audio should try SET out at least once. It's like a rite of passage.