SET the best?


Is SET amplification where we should all end up? I keep reading posts where people tell of their journeys from plenty power to micro power, and how amazing SET amplification is 45 set 211 set 845 set otl, and usually, ....with the right speaker. I have yet to read of anyone who has gone the other direction from SET, to High watt beast class A amps or others.
If your speakers can be driven by minimal wattage, is this the most realistic, natural sound we can achieve? versus say, 86db sensitive speakers and a 1000w amp?
Is the end result solely based on speaker pairing? circuit? tubes?

I am in the process of changing my direction in my search for realistic sound, just because, and wondering if this really is the best direction to be going.
From what I have been reading I think it may be.

What do we get with SET? What do we give up?

What's you favorite color?
hanaleimike

Showing 1 response by dividebytube

Back in the 'Sound Practices' day, I played with SE amps. 300B and 2A3. PP 6B4Gs too. Though pleasant sounding, I was forever trying to find a good speaker to match up with them. I tried different modern and vintage coaxials without success.

I eventually turned away from Triode SE and back into Ultralinear designs. The higher power worked better with my Altec 604 / Eminence speakers (ie - the UREI 813A). The best DIY design of mine was a SE EL156 UL with a pentode front end. Lots of power (~20Ws), fast, detailed but not clinical. This was nirvana for me.

Then I accidentally got a good deal on a Threshold S/500 amplifier. They gripped the UREI speakers better than any tube amp I have ever heard. No solid state glare or grain - and they have enough power to drive any speaker I would want.

So I sold my SE EL156 amps to a friend (where they are still churning away) and after twenty years of tube amps jumped on the solid state wagon. I'm not getting off either. Though lacking in some of the qualities that tube gear has, good solid-state also has it's own signature that appeals to me.