2. amps-preamps
  3. 164327-148023

Separates or not?

I'm redoing my office system.  I just bought a pair of Maggie's, the 1.7is.  I have a Bryston 3bnrb for amplification.  The question relates to preamplification.

My budget is around $4000 give or take.  I need mc/mm phono amplification and line level preamplification.  I am looking at new or demo. I would consider used only if it has a significant transferable manufacturer's waranty.

I have a Michel Gyrodec Ii with SME 309 arm, and several different low output MC cartridges(.2-.4 mv output).

My question is, given my needs, would I get better bang for the buck at this price level by getting a preamp with an integrated phono stage, or going with a line level preamp and a separate phono stage?  

Thanks.
xaak

Showing 4 responses by xaak

xaak OP
43 posts
 
Integrated amp? Yeah, that ship sailed for me in the early 80s and I eagerly wished it goodbye.  Maybe if I had a tiny room  but that won't happen.

I have a couple SUTs, but IMHO, a good active stage can perform better.

Thanks for the Decaware suggestion.  The preamp looks interesting.



xaak OP
43 posts
 
Thanks to everyone who answered, but to nudge this towards getting back on track, I'm redoing my preamplification.

Given a budget of $4k give or take, can I get better bang for the buck with a separate phono preamp and line level preamp or with a preamp with built in phono stage.
xaak OP
43 posts
 
@oldhvymec2, Yeah I hear you. I ordered the Maggies in mid November and they just came in last week. First, I don’t think I want to wait that long and second, I haven’t yet decided whether I want to go with tubes. I’ve owned both tube and SS, and I have a decision to make if I want to put up with the hassle of tubes again.
xaak OP
43 posts
 
@ jasonbourne52

I like Bryston stuff, but the .5 is way too old a design for me.  I'm looking for something current or at least from within the last few years if I do go used.
More to discover