2. amps-preamps
  3. 1404789005

Seeking more 3d imaging, deeper/wider soundstage

I'm considering replacing either my amp or my pre. My system is profiled in my system link. Which do you think would improve soundstage/imaging more:
Replace the P3? I'd consider used McCormack, or a passive line stage, but my amp clips at 5v, which is what my DAC puts out when using the XLR outputs, and I'd like to try those someday...not sure a passive is a good fit for my system? Plus I require a remote. That's a deal breaker.
Replace the Rotel RB-1080? I'd consider parasound (a21 is a bit too pricey for me), used McCormack, odyssey, maybe even older krell or classe. I want XLR inputs tho.
Budget is $900-$1200 for either. Music spans the full gamut, excluding hip hop and country. Room is small, 12x12x8. I'm going to throw up some affordable foam acoustic absorption this summer (foam factory). Thnx in advance.
realremo

Showing 2 responses by geoffkait

geoffkait's avatar
geoffkait
23,365 posts
 
Shakeydeal wrote,

"Two things I would suggest.

Spread the speakers a little further apart, you have more real estate there to play with."

Actually, moving the speakers closer together frequently works better. I think it's audiophile nature to assume wider speaker positions equals better soundstage. Start with 4 feet and move out until you hit the sweet spot.

"Consider the purchase of a good tube amp. This alone will give you more body and 3 dimensional sound over the Rotel amp."

Now, that I agree with.
geoffkait's avatar
geoffkait
23,365 posts
 
Realremo, no worrries, mate, there's a very good chance the next CD you play is also inverted phase, so it all evens out. Always look on the bright side.
More to discover