Sade This Far
The packaging is also cheap!
Two hundred of my dollars gone for this poorly remastered cheaply packaged mess. You would do far better to just go to eBay or discogs and seek a clean copy of an original pressing. I usually treat my new albums to a new hi-end record sleeve after I clean them in my KLAudio ultrasonic record cleaner. Not these, I put this mess back in their original cheap paper sleeves.
If I seem bothered, I am as this stinks of just a rush to push something out there with little regard for quality just to make a quick buck.
- ...
- 16 posts total
I bought this last summer and just opened. The very first album, Diamond Life, had a manufacturing defect that was visible to the naked eye and caused skipping and ticks duringSmooth Operator. It is clear there was no quality control. As the record companies don’t take back bad pressings the retailers or consumer is stuck if past the return date. The pressing of Diamond Life appears to be thinner and lower quality than the other albums in the box. Needless to say quite a loss. The others in the set sound better and appear to be on 180g vinyl. I opened another box and this time Diamond Life had no visible manufacturing defects. Again the album is thinner and the quality of the pressing is suspect. For a high priced box set there is no booklet, pictures or discussions by the artists. No alternative takes. No additional tracks. There is a foam pad where a booklet could or an album of alternative takes could have been inserted. Disappointing. |
@audiofun funny, I’ve sort of come around to your side a bit after listening to them for awhile now. Not quite the disaster you describe, but certainly could be better mix wise and packaging. One thing I’ve noticed is inconsistent panning. The presses are not great for sure. On the other hand I’m listening to The Yes Album currently. That just kicks a$$! |
- 16 posts total