Rushton's DIY approach to ultrasonic record cleaning published by Positive Feedback


Over the past several months I’ve invested a fair amount of time exploring ultrasonic cleaning because I’ve fallen way too far behind in my record cleaning. With over 6000 LPs, I needed a faster way to clean than my trusted multi-step manual wet/vac cleaning process. That manual process got the best results I’ve ever found, but I was not keeping up with my collection and it is just painful to me to play a record that I’ve not cleaned.

In exploring ultrasonic cleaning, my hope was to find that I could complete multiple LPs in a single US cleaning cycle and greatly speed up my rate of cleaning records. My goals were to FIRST do no harm and then SECOND see how close I could get to the results of my manual cleaning regimen.

My past experiences with ultrasonic cleaning demonstrations were completely underwhelming. What I heard did not approach the excellence I was achieving with my multi-step wet/vac cleaning regimen.

What I’ve learned, and now apply in my new ultrasonic cleaning regimen, are multiple elements to the cleaning process that must be used in combination to achieve the best possible results. And these results have far exceeded my expectations.

I’d thought of posting here on Audiogon the summary of what I’ve learned and am now applying as my new record cleaning regimen, but the inability to post images and to apply formatting here caused me to send my summary to David Robinson at Positive Feedback who has graciously published my comments as a guest essay. Please read that essay, and then come back here to Audiogon with comments and to share your experiences:

http://positive-feedback.com/audio-discourse/rushton-paul-diy-approach-ultrasonic-cleaning-lps/


I look forward to some further discussion and sharing of experiences.

.


rushton

Showing 2 responses by dgarretson

Hello Terry & Rushton, I have used both the Chinese and Elmasonic models and find the Elmasonic a step up in effectiveness. At temps above 48-49C I have warped records. Some LPs return to shape as they cool and others require flattening. The digital temp gauges on these unit are not always accurate, and should be confirmed with a quick-read thermometer. Also, independent of the heater the ultrasonic action will naturally raise the bath temperature as it works-- sometimes rather quickly. I begin cleaning at 35C and give the system a rest when it reaches 48C. At some point I’m going to add cooling fins to my DIY filter circuit to keep temps linear at a safe level.

Spencer, I think you'll find that once you arrive at the correct chemistry, the LP comes out of the bath dry except for the immersed portion.  A quick swipe with the Vinyl stack microfiber cloth clears 95% of moisture from that section, after which the record will air dry in a few minutes.

I still have my VPI 16.5 and have experimented with it to vacuum off ultrasonically cleaned LPs.  The problem is that since the record has two wet sides, the foam mat on the 16.5 will pick up moisture that transfers to the dry side when the LP is flipped.  For awhile I used an old Ringmat II with thin cork strips on top of the 16.5 platter to minimize the re-wetting of the LP, but the microfiber cloth is simpler and works just as well.