I have had fantastic success in running speakers in series.
I have a set of Klipsch 5.2 with a 12, 10, and a medium size horn.
Loving the nice low end response, the 5.2 lacks the mids and the sensitivity in the highs that I get from a set of 3.2's which have a 10, 8 and a smaller horn.
The 3.2's have very nice mids, decent highs, but lack body on the low end.
I simply stacked the 3.2's ontop of the 5.2's running off an old Scott Tube amp, and I am now getting the best of both worlds.
So any theory about destroying your sound by running two sets of speakers in series is not an absolute universal concept. It's working fantastically for me.
I have a set of Klipsch 5.2 with a 12, 10, and a medium size horn.
Loving the nice low end response, the 5.2 lacks the mids and the sensitivity in the highs that I get from a set of 3.2's which have a 10, 8 and a smaller horn.
The 3.2's have very nice mids, decent highs, but lack body on the low end.
I simply stacked the 3.2's ontop of the 5.2's running off an old Scott Tube amp, and I am now getting the best of both worlds.
So any theory about destroying your sound by running two sets of speakers in series is not an absolute universal concept. It's working fantastically for me.