2. amps-preamps
  3. 981833444

Rowland 8TiHC vs. Lamm M1.1

I own a Roland 8T and althou it sounds exquisite I understand that the iHC version has sgnificant sonic improvements. However since Rowland will not upgrade the 8T into it's iHC version I would have to sell and buy to upgrade. Because of this I am also considering the Lamms M1.1 of which I have only heard praises. In addition they are very often mached with the Verity Parsifals wich I am geting pretty soon. What do you think about how these two beasts compare? Has anyone had the chance to audition both of them? I use a Wadia 861 directly into the amp., cabling is XLO Signature.
jmr

Showing 2 responses by jmr

jmr OP
44 posts
 
Dan, just ignore this Chriskh guy. The MC6 is what Rowland is trying to push, however there are a couple of things I dislike. The MC6 does'nt have the gain selector switch that models 8 have. I find this specially usefull since I run my Wadia directly into the amp.,if you use a preamp this should'nt be a concern. Also I ca'nt help thinking that all those speakers posts and all the internal bridging which very usefull for multichannel aplications may represent sonic compromises when it comes to stereo use.
jmr OP
44 posts
 
Dan, you are right in that the three should have a similar character in their sound. But remember that in this hobby even small improvements cost a lot of $. I would be caution about JRDG answer to your inquiries, I think that the MC6 is more a product of a marketing strategy than of true sonic improvement. That may be also why the denial to further upgrade the 8T. In my opinion a poor strategy, I think Rowland users had a great product loyalty in part because JRDG also was loyal to them. That appears to be changing. Anyway in my case I've decide to go the Lamm way.I am getting a pair of M1.1 next week, I'll let you know how it goes. Regards,Jose.
More to discover