here's a good tutorial for setting up EAC:
http://www.teqnilogik.com/tutorials/eac.shtml
some people will say that WAV is better than FLAC. others will tell you that FLAC is identical to WAV and therefore sounds the same. FLAC has a few positives over WAV in that the file size is smaller, FLAC offers better tagging ability, and the most important feature (in my opinion) is a checksum error capability.
in other words, if you encode a song to WAV and encode the same song to FLAC, if the WAV get's partially corrupted, it'll still play. if the FLAC gets partially corrupted, it won't play so you'll have to re-encode the file so that there are no errors. this was the best explanation i ever got regarding FLAC's checksum superiority to WAV:
"Corruption just means that a bit or several bits aren't what they should be. It could mean that something that's normally 3dB is now 3.5dB...or 90dB. Typically it's more "brief white noise" like a pop or crack, but technically it could be the whole range from totally inaudible to blatantly obvious.
Nothing is immune to it, but having a checksum in all of your files means you can know immediately when there's any corruption at all. Not having a checksum means you can't really ever be sure."
i'm not familiar with AIFF, but it's my understanding that it is for primary use with apple's and itunes.
tagging is how one enters the meta data. there are several programs that allow you to edit the meta data. think of the meta data in the same way as you might think of cd's encoded with cd-text. the meta data is just the pertinent information about the song file, ie...song name, artist name, album name, year, genre, composer, etc...
http://www.teqnilogik.com/tutorials/eac.shtml
some people will say that WAV is better than FLAC. others will tell you that FLAC is identical to WAV and therefore sounds the same. FLAC has a few positives over WAV in that the file size is smaller, FLAC offers better tagging ability, and the most important feature (in my opinion) is a checksum error capability.
in other words, if you encode a song to WAV and encode the same song to FLAC, if the WAV get's partially corrupted, it'll still play. if the FLAC gets partially corrupted, it won't play so you'll have to re-encode the file so that there are no errors. this was the best explanation i ever got regarding FLAC's checksum superiority to WAV:
"Corruption just means that a bit or several bits aren't what they should be. It could mean that something that's normally 3dB is now 3.5dB...or 90dB. Typically it's more "brief white noise" like a pop or crack, but technically it could be the whole range from totally inaudible to blatantly obvious.
Nothing is immune to it, but having a checksum in all of your files means you can know immediately when there's any corruption at all. Not having a checksum means you can't really ever be sure."
i'm not familiar with AIFF, but it's my understanding that it is for primary use with apple's and itunes.
tagging is how one enters the meta data. there are several programs that allow you to edit the meta data. think of the meta data in the same way as you might think of cd's encoded with cd-text. the meta data is just the pertinent information about the song file, ie...song name, artist name, album name, year, genre, composer, etc...