Review: Yamaha PX-3 Turntable


Category: Analog

I have always been intrigued by the linear tracking turntables. God and my wallet knows I have had many of these over the years. Sadly to say most never lived up to the promise.

However recently that has changed. Was fortunate to find a NOS Yamaha PX 3 Linear Tracking turntable. It also came with a very fine Yamaha 705 Low Output Moving Coil phono cartridge. Yamaha did make another one of these called the PX 2.

By the size,weight and construction Yamaha appeared to have spared no expense on this project and it shows very well indeed. Weight is about 25 pounds.

Have had this one for several weeks now and the performance is quite stellar to say the least. Set up was fairly easy, but it does need a rock steady platform and needs to be level.

So on to the test. Mounted the enclosed Yamaha 705 MC Cartridge. Put on Sadao Watanabe Live at Budokhan. To say that I was startled is a major understatement. The channel separation and soundstage totally blew me away. Name an adjective to describe the presence of this piece, well you can name them all dealing with the analog experience. Next up was Santana Abraxas, just had to try some rock on this and once again the PX 3 delivered the music with impact an clarity that would have been hard to imagine. So on to a Classical Album Frederick Fennel & The Cleveland Symphonic Wind Band. Just astounding the strikes on the anvil,- gad I thought it was live and in the room!! French horns came through as I had not heard before. Except for the most exalted linear trackers I had not heard this kind of performance at all. Truly impressed for this old jaded audiophile. Not familiar with the Yamaha 705 MC cartridge, but it sonics are truly in the higher end. Without question this is one of the most musical turntables I have owned since I got started in this hobby in 1957 and I have owned a boat load of tables since '57.

Yamaha really has only 3 truly collectible turntables the PX 2,PX 3 and YF 800. These tables are holding value and beginning to move up in price. Audiogon Blue Book puts this as $340.00 as a used average. My opinion one of high ends true bargains. You can spend a ton more, but you will be severly tested to do better. My neighbor with his VPI Scout was more than duly impressed and when I told him what I paid he nearly passed out!!!.

Later on will be trying different moving coils to see if the current performance can be enchanced.

The only caveat I find is the fixed interconnects. However the ones supplied are quite heavy and gold plated. The accessories package contained additional head shell and counter weights to use heavier cartridges.

So if you get a chance to acquire one of these,do so. Yamaha got linear tracking very right with this. No it is not in the exalted level of linear tracking tables,but will clearly hold its own up to todays $1,200.00 level tables. In 1982 this went for $695.00 not cheap by any standard of that year.

Specifications:

Tone Arm Section;
Arm Type: Linear Tracking Arm
Servo System: Opto-electronic tracking error sensor and
coreless dc servo motor.
Total Length: 236mm(9 9/32")
Effective Length: 190MM(7 15/32")
Tracking Force Device: Static Balance Sliding Weight(0 to
2.5 Grams)
Effective Mass: Tracking Force Proportional 17.0(when trak
ing force 1.5g)
Cartridge Weight Range: 5-11 grams 10 to 18 with optional
Counter weights.
Tracking error angle: +/- 0.15 degrees
Arm Lifter: Electronic Oil Damped
Adjustable Arm Height: +/- 4.0mm
Headshell: Forged Aluminum EIA Type 8.0g Gold Plated Conn-
(ector)
RCA Cable: Neglex 2496 low impedance double cylindrical
cord. Capacitance 130pf,Resistance 1 ohm to pin

Rotary Section

Motor: DC 4 phase 8 pole coreless Hall motor
Drive System: Direct Drive
Servo Systen: Quartz PLL
F.G. :Total Circumference intergrating type
Speed: With Lock Indicator 33 1/3 and 45 rpm
Platter: 30 CM(12") aluminum die cast,weight 3 pounds
Moment of Inertia: 210kg including mat

External Design

Cabinent: High Density BMC(bulk moulding compound)
Dust cover: 4 MM acrylic weighing 1.1kg
Hinges: Detachable Type
Insulator: Combination of spring and rubber type with
height adjustment

Control Section

Automatic Functions:
Auto Lead In
Auto Return
Auto Repeat
Auto Cut
Auto Up(during power off)
Size Selector 17/30 CM
Manual Functions:
Arm up
Arm down
Left and Right 2 speed sensing.

General:
Signal to Noise ratio: 77dB(DIN B)
Wow & Flutter: 0.015% WRMS
Power Supply: 120V60Hz U.S. and Canadian
Dimensions:18 1/2 x 5 7/8 x 16 7/8
Net Weight: 26 pounds 6 ounces

For a turntable that is 20 years young the above specifications are quite spectacular by any standard.

Operation of this table has that solid smooth silk feel and for all its automation is remarkably quiet.

So if you have ever wanted to try a linear tracker, I certainley endorse the Yamaha PX 3 and for a lot of us this could be the perfect stopping place. To do better than this table one will pay dearly.

Associated gear
Click to view my Virtual System

Similar products
Denon,Kenwood,Luxman,JVC,etc
ferrari
Where does one find an NOS table? More to the point, where did you get it from? Would be interesting to see what a controlled listening comparaison with some of the sacred cows of turntabledom would yield.
This came from the original owner,who just never got around to using it. So it sat in his garage for some 20 years. This was on another auction site and after several e mails to the party was convinced he was legitimate seller. So bid and won. There is always a certain amount of risk in New Old Stock, just because it was never used does not mean it will work. However most NOS items do perform as new and this was no exception.

The PX 3 sits beside the Oracle Alexandria so I do have a reference to draw upon. Sonically the Oracle is better, but the difference between the two is very marginal indeed. And the Oracle has all the recent updates as well. So I was very surprised to find that the PX 3 was competing very well in that arena. Over the years have owned Linn,Ariston,Revolver,Revox,Rega,Oracle and a host of other highly touted high end tables. The PX 3 can compete with them and in some instances the PX 3 will sound better.

Fully realize that many will carp on a table such as this and it is fair to do so. All I can say is find a PX 3 or PX 2 and put it to the test. You will be very surprised at the results. I was and I am just about as jaded as one gets in high end. Totally surprised by the PX 3 performance. Truly worth seeking out.

Now use the Oracle for critcal listening and for audiophile records. The PX 3 gets daily duty and what a joy it is to use and listen to. Yamaha really pulled out all the stops on this one. It is very apparent that Yamaha decided early on with this design to build a linear tracker that kept the promise of such a design and no doubt they were succesful. These continued in production until 1986, by then the CD revolution was building speed. Was deemed to expensive to continue with as retail price on these would have to go up higher than they already were.So with reluctance Yamaha ceased production on the PX 2 and PX 3.
I've got a PX-3 also. Got it from a stereo repair store for $25. It had no counterweight so I fabricated one out of aluminium and melted fishing weights. Looks good and works even better. Best $25 turntable I've ever bought!
I remember having this TT at one of the stores I worked at. It is decent and there's quite a few things you could do to improve its performance:

1) Get an audiophile mat (make sure VTA stays the same if it can't be adjusted)

2) Change interconnects.

3) Remove the power supply and install it outside on a separate housing.

4) Dampen the insides with Dynamat Extreme

5) Place it on an IKEA Lack shelf or Neuance

You might find the unit to be more enjoyable than the Oracle if you do these mods. Welcome to DD's!
I have one of these turntables but the servo motor went bad. I called my local Yamaha dealer and they said there was not way to get a replacement motor because of the age of the turntable. Does anyone out there know where I can get a part to fix this?