Review: Sonore ultraRendu


This is a review of the Sonore ultraRendu. This is an ethernet-to-usb converter that I use for HQ Player Network Audio Adapter output or for Roon-Ready output. In either output mode, I use the ultraRendu device with Roon. I do not use the other output modes, which include Squeezelite output, Sharepoint output, and MPD/DLNA output. My Roon Core and HQ Player (embedded version) run on a Small Green Computer sonicTransporter i9 music server. In the past I’ve also run Roon Core and HQ player (desktop version) on a Mac Mini, in which case I can dispense with the ultraRendu and connect the Mac with a USB cable directly to my integrated streamer/DAC/pre-amp. I also can connect an ethernet cable from the sonicTransporter directly to my streamer/DAC/pre-amp, bypassing the ultraRendu.

I notice little if any difference in the sound quality of these various connections, per se. So, why use the ultraRendu at all? The main reason is that HQ Player embedded version runs a bit better on my sonicTransporter than the HQ Player desktop version does on my 2014 Mac Mini, allowing (in some cases) higher upsampling rates. As far as I know, I have no way to use HQ Player embedded on the sonicTransporter without inserting the ultraRendu as an NAA (adapter) in between the sonicTransporter and the streamer/DAC/pre-amp.

So, basically, I’m using it as a switching device upstream from my preamp. The ultraRendu needs a separate power supply. For this purpose I use Uptone Audio’s ultraCap linear power supply, whose case is almost identical to the ultraRendu’s. The ultraRendu and ultraCap add cost, complexity, clutter and heat to my system. So I’d love to find a satisfactory way to run HQ Player embedded on my music server (the sonicTransporter i9) without these extra little devices. Some people might be satisfied with the sound I get by using my streamer/DAC/pre-amp as a network-attached Roon-ready device. In that case, I could dispense with HQ Player, the ultraRendu, and the ultraCap. In some future Roon release, maybe the digital signal processing features (including upsampling) will improve to the point that I’ll be ready to do that. Meanwhile, the ultraRendu works pretty well for my current needs, usually. An exception is when, after a power outage, the USB handshake sometimes does not recover gracefully. Then I sometimes have to do a sequence of reboots/reconnects to restore the connections. I don’t know if the fault is with the ultraRendu, the DAC, or the combination.

Caveat: I’m writing this review primarily to qualify for a free upgrade to my player’s operating system. The vendor wants upgrading users to first post an online review of a Sonore Rendu series player, otherwise pay for the upgrade. I apologize in advance for any unintended inaccuracies in the above review, in which case I’d welcome polite corrections from other posters.

 

 

tk21

Follow-up to my original post above:

The founder of Sonore Computer Audio informs me, "You can select the onboard USB output directly in HQ Player’s settings." I have not recently (if ever) tried to feed HQ Player output from my sonicTransporter (music server) directly to a USB-attached DAC, without using a Rendu player. I’d be interested to hear from anyone else who has compared sound quality with and without the Rendu (sonicTransporter-HQP > USB > DAC vs. sonicTransporter-HQP > ethernet > Rendu > USB > DAC).

21

 

do you still run the BacchMac?
 

I have it and sold my Antipodes K50 to buy.

 

 Now running the MM are the core in Roon.

 

I am not sure what music server to replace the K50 as Edgar thinks I should get the Roon Nucleus plus.

Any thought on what to do?

 

 

I let my maintenance license expire on Bacch4Mac and do not use the software anymore. I was not hearing enough consistent improvement to justify the cost or the  complexity.  Maybe I never had it set up properly.  With Bacch-Orc (room correction) coming out, I'm a little tempted to renew and upgrade.

When I was weighing Roon Nucleus against other options, several years ago, I decided to go with Small Green Computer's Sonic Transporter as my music server.  It was a bit less expensive, more powerful, and seemed to be more flexible. The only possible downside I saw was that it ran its own proprietary operating system, not the Roon OS (ROCK).  

I haven't revisited the Sonic Transporter vs. Nucleus comparison lately, so I don't know if my conclusions from several years ago still apply.