2. member-reviews
  3. 1208922337

Review: Jeff Rowland Continuum 500 Amplifier

Category: Amplifiers

Preliminary, limited review --
I haven't even taken delivery of my Continuum 500 integrated amplifier yet, but I got to listen for 3-hours this afternoon to help with the decision to put down $8,800 to take it home.

My dealer is Soundings, South of Denver, Colorado, owned and operated by Rod Tomson with the very able assistance of this very knowledgeable crew. See the Soundings site at http://www.soinc1021.qwestoffice.net/

When I arrived at Soundings the Continuum 500 was driving the very nice DALI Helicon 400 Mk.2 speakers. This are very nice speakers that received a positive review from Michael Fremer in Stereophile recently.

I listened to several cuts from the following CDs:
"Strike A Deep Chord" on Justice Records
"Cannon Reloaded" on Concord
"Breakfast on the Morning Tram" by Stacey Kent on Concord
"Famous Blue Raincoat" by Jennifer Warnes on Shout
"Don't Take Your Time" by Erin Bode on MaxJazz

I started off really worried when I played "Mercy, Mercy, Mercy" from the Cannonball Adderley tribute album, Cannon Reloaded. The bass was indistinct, with few overtones and just showing a one-note quality. The bass on this cut is Marcus Miller playing some really tasty electric bass, with lots of energy and pop. It was lacking all those.

After that I pulled out the Jennifer Warnes CD and played the "If It Be Your Will" cut which has extensive, low, bass synthesizer. On the DALIs it lacked definition and detail. I just sounded like a low sine wave being switched on and off, with no character.

Listening to the DALIs with several vocals, with more typical, higher bass and things were pretty good, with great imaging, rich midrange and high-end details.

When I expressed my concerns to Soundings' Mark Krekeler he suggested that we put the Vienna Acoustic Beethoven Baby Grands into the system. There was immediate nirvana. Now Marcus Miller's bass was rich with overtones and details. The synth on the Warnes CD now had texture and detail, not just sine waves.

Now I could really listen the amp and not be drawn to focusing on what I wasn't hearing in the particular speakers attached.

Several cuts on the "Strike a Deep Chord" were very revealing. The richness of Odetta's voice has absolutely powerful. The chest and head were clearly revealed. Most striking was Clarence "Gatemouth" Brown's which features extreme dynamics, from almost silent to huge sections of bass, guitar, vocal, horns and drums. The quiet was almost totally black.

The highs had no extra edge. I was really surprised by this, given the low hours on the amp. Clarence plays with a piercing tone on "The Drifter". (We guitar players call this tone, "icepick-in-the-eye" bright). Well it was all there, but not ugly. I didn't detect any of the usual "new equipment needs burn-in syndrome" so if this things gets better with time I'll be VERY, VERY pleased.

That's all for now. I need to get it into my own system, in my own room, burn it in for a few hundred more hours, then spend three or four several hour sessions to get more conclusive. I'll hang onto the Conrad Johnson CA200 long enough to do some meaningful comparisons. (Watch for a great deal on A'gon in the not too distant future).

Here's the bottom line, I loved the Continuum 500 enough that I'll be taking a $8800 or so check to Soundings this Friday.

Dave

Associated gear
Vienna Acoustic Beethoven Baby Grand speakers
Analysis Solo Crystal Oval 8 speaker cable
Pro-ject RM10 turntable
Sumiko Blackbird cartridge
Pioneer Dv-58AV universal player modified by Ric Schultz

Similar products
Conrad Johnson CA200
Bryston 2/2B amp/preamplifier
Jeff Rowland 501 mono blocks
Jeff Rowland 102 stereo amp
dcstep
55 responses Add your response
dcstep OP
1,518 posts
 
Kiwi, if you don't mind me asking, how long did your audition of the C-500 last? Was it warm to the touch when you finished? You've already said that you don't know how many total hours were on it, but will you tell us how many hours was it in your system, powered on continuously? When you compared it to other amps, did you turn it off or unplug it during the switch?

Reading your other reviews and comments I see that you're not totally satisfied with your digital front end. If so, why aren't your reviews all analog or at least all with SACD, which you recently said you much prefer to CD?

The small troubles you cite, could be due to front end and/or lack of proper burn-in and stabilization within the reference system.

Dave
kiwi_1282001
312 posts
 
The Continuum 500 does indeed need 150-200 hours to sound it's best, IMHO. (It's less than some other Rowland products, probably due to the heat generated by the PFC units). I've also found that if you unplug it for even a short while, then it needs a full 24 hours to get to "full song." It's very presentable after an hour or two, but doesn't get as fully involving until a full day or so.
Dave
Dcstep 09-09-08

Hi Dave,

I have just finished a follow up audition of the C-500 amplifier. At the start of the audition this amplifer had 500 hours on the clock, plus i left it on for a further 48 hours before serious listening started. My review is HERE. Interestingly, my conclusion despite the hundreds of additional hours [and audition in two different systems] remains unchanged. The Continuum amp got surprisingly hot [for class D] - perhaps as a result of having to drive low sensitivity 84dB planar loudspeakers?
dcstep OP
1,518 posts
 
Beautiful review(s) Kiwi. Thanks for linking here. Between our two reviews, that's the most in-depth coverage that the C-500 has received.

What I'm about to say is NOT meant as a criticism of your associated equipment, I just think that my equipment is more synergistic with the C-500, particularly my Playback Designs MPS-5 and dynamic speakers. Clearly, potential buyers need to consider how the C-500 will fit within the context of their existing system.

The source is absolutly critical with the C-500. If one starts with a great analog system and strives to match that with their digital sources, then I think they can find the C-500 totally involving. The C-500 literally "forced" me to seek out and move to my MPS-5; otherwise, I was constantly listening to LPs.

I haven't listened to the C-500s with planars, so I can't really add to what you've laid out so nicely. I DO know that the C-500 "likes" dynamic speakers, particularly those that benefit from a lot of control. I have no experience with the C-500 with either extremely efficient dynamic drivers or planars.

Oh, the heat is caused by the PFC circuits. Mine idles at 120-degrees F, inside an armoire. Jeff that's "no problemo". Jeff says that the C-250 (no PFCs) runs cool to the touch.

Dave
guidocorona
4,298 posts
 
Hi Kiwi, I can confirm that the heat from the C500 is caused by the internal PFC module. It is a 1500W unit from a different manufacturer than the 750W twin units used in the 312. . . and it generates much more heat than the other modules combined. . . your speakers are blameless! G.
husk01
171 posts
 
Guido, Have you spoken to Jeff about when he feels the software problem in the Criterion remote is going to be solved?
Log in to respond
More to discover