I did critical testing of the two speakers today. We spend one-and-a-half hours in well equipped listening rooms in New York City.
And the winner...
My wife and I agreed that the B&W sounded the best... By far...
The Revel speakers were much more reserved. The low frequencies were too restrained and the high frequencies did not seem as brilliant. I am not sure of the right terminology, but the Revel speakers seemed flat.
When listening to the B&Ws I came away thinking: this is natural. There is no speaker, there are musicians in the room. Someone has lifted the cloth veil, there is clarity.
However, the reviews of the Revel Salon 2s have been filled with superlatives. I wonder if the fact that I am a somewhat novice listener is clouding my opinion. Perhaps it is like a novice wine drinker preferring sweet wines. Over time many migrate to drier wines.
Will my taste evolve over time to prefer the more restrained sound of the Revels?
And the winner...
My wife and I agreed that the B&W sounded the best... By far...
The Revel speakers were much more reserved. The low frequencies were too restrained and the high frequencies did not seem as brilliant. I am not sure of the right terminology, but the Revel speakers seemed flat.
When listening to the B&Ws I came away thinking: this is natural. There is no speaker, there are musicians in the room. Someone has lifted the cloth veil, there is clarity.
However, the reviews of the Revel Salon 2s have been filled with superlatives. I wonder if the fact that I am a somewhat novice listener is clouding my opinion. Perhaps it is like a novice wine drinker preferring sweet wines. Over time many migrate to drier wines.
Will my taste evolve over time to prefer the more restrained sound of the Revels?