Thanks everyone!
I've had the A3.2 burning in for about 40 hours now and after doing a bunch of A/B comparisons, I haven't been able to notice much of a difference between the two. The Sony was $300 three years ago (and is labeled as having 24/96 DACs) but it is still holding it's own. I think my inital excitement colored my original post.
What gives?
It's not that I don't believe in sonic differences. When I upgraded from my Yamaha reciever to a B&K Ref 20 and amp- I heard a huge difference. The same was true when I upgraded from Audioquest cables to Transparent- it was night and day. Are my expectations too high?
I'm still undecided. I am thinking of the external DAC or auditioning a Rotel RDV-1080 or Pioneer Elite 47a (to get the all in one unit) if I can't hear much of a difference.
Thanks-
Scrapiron
I've had the A3.2 burning in for about 40 hours now and after doing a bunch of A/B comparisons, I haven't been able to notice much of a difference between the two. The Sony was $300 three years ago (and is labeled as having 24/96 DACs) but it is still holding it's own. I think my inital excitement colored my original post.
What gives?
It's not that I don't believe in sonic differences. When I upgraded from my Yamaha reciever to a B&K Ref 20 and amp- I heard a huge difference. The same was true when I upgraded from Audioquest cables to Transparent- it was night and day. Are my expectations too high?
I'm still undecided. I am thinking of the external DAC or auditioning a Rotel RDV-1080 or Pioneer Elite 47a (to get the all in one unit) if I can't hear much of a difference.
Thanks-
Scrapiron