2. misc-audio
  3. 1187670523

Regards to the Rack

I've been a builder for a long time. I mostly work with stone, so call me a mason if you want to assign a name. As with any type of building, the foundation dertermines the performance and layout of each consecutive layer.

So I come to my point. Recently I have entertained purchasing an equipment rack that costs more than my CDP. The justification-the foundation plays a larger role in performance than I previously thought. Before I was content with an uneven antique credenza but now I have begun to believe that foundation is the answer to allowing components to perform to their potential even if the cost is significant.

The question is here, are there others who share similar opinions of the fundamentals of foundation or am I just off my rocker to think I'll get that much more noticable preformance from a rack? Well no need to answer the latter part really, I am an audio-nut so we already know the answer there.

Regards
Peter
mariasplunge

Showing 1 response by wellfed

wellfed's avatar
wellfed
690 posts
 
Ric Cummins at Argent Audio provided me with this recipe for resonance control platforms.

2"X2" sandwich footers of 1/4" plexiglas/posterboard/plexiglas

beneath

1" or 2" granite or marble

mismatched Timken bearing/cups between component and stone

The Timken bearing part numbers are

LM11910 raceway cup
09067 bearing

I've never tried this recipe due to rack space limitations. I have played with the Timken bearings themselves for footers and my results were mixed. I suspect using the full recipe would yield outstanding results. E.B. Atmus was the cheapest source for the Timken bearing parts that I found. If I had such a favorable arrangement regarding granite availability and pricing, I'd give Ric's plan a whirl personally. If it doesn't quite turn out to be your cup of tea I believe you could tweak further with Herbies Audio Lab products. I'd recommend this in either event actually.
More to discover