Recommendation Request for Tube Power Amplifier


I have been using an all solid state system for many years. I hear so much about the "tube sound" experience. I'd like to check it out.The only experience with tube amps that I have comes from these two amps...

One is the Paragon System E Tube Preamp with phono. I bought this new about 1980. It uses six 12ax7 type tubes. I used it quite heavily for a few years. When it developed problems with the volume control, I replaced it with something I can't remember. In storage for a few decades, I pulled it out six months ago, cleaned all contacts, especially the volume pot. Still works!. I have measured this guy quite thoroughly. Phono gain is 43 dB. Distortion from Tape Out is below the noise floor at -95dB. Noise at 60 Hz and multiples is -60dB or better below 0dB recorded level.. Great numbers, even compared to modern preamps. I replaced the old 12AX7 tubes with six matched Genelex Gold Lion tubes.  I'm using this now as a phono preamp with the Koetsu RS and a step up transformer at 20x (Cinemag 1254). The table is a brand new Technics SL-1200G. I really like this sound.

But I'd like to try tube amplification again without spending a fortune.

What tube power amp would be a great match for this system? Years ago, I had a CJ MV75 power amp. I liked the sound, but hated the continual tweaking of the bias, even with brand new tubes. I sold it.

My budget is $3K or less.My system is not too efficient (86 dB sensitivity Revel 105 Bookshelf speakers and a self powered HSU sub, 100Hz xover), so I probably need more than the 3 watt/ch amps I see for some of the less expensive models. How much power do I need? I'm not sure. I've never heard any problems with the Levinson No. 27 or the present Bryston 2.5B cubed, but they both put out 100 W/ch or more. Balanced inputs would be great, but not absolutely necessary.

I consider my present system to sound quite neutral. I worked very hard to get it that way. I'm very pleased with the sound.

I want to exprience that warm tube sound if only to have a change of pace. Or maybe...

Thanks for your help!

128x128Ag insider logo xs@2xkevemaher

Showing 4 responses by rodman99999

     Nothing (AT ALL) wrong with the above, but: here's another tack, you might consider.

     You already have two excellent amps, that are a better match to your less-than-efficient speakers, than tube power would be.   Even with the powered sub.

      Either would easily prove transparent enough to convey whatever improvements made, in your preamp.

       The Paragon System E (NICE pre, btw) was built with MOSTLY Metalized Mylar caps, which are good (basically) for ever.

       The external power supply is a huge plus, far as noise reduction.

       BUT: if yours has the two, light blue, electrolytic caps; they are over forty years old and could (probably) use replacement.    As well as any electrolytics in the PS.

       Older components can still sound good with aged/weakened electrolytic caps, but: much better, if refreshed.

        Whether you choose to address those or not: why not explore the world of 12AX7s extant, to shape your system's sound, to better suit your aural palette?

        Were you to purchase just one pair of NOS 12AX7/ECC83/5751s: there are three positions per channel, in which you could try them. (great flexibility).

                                                        ie:

         For a warmer presentation: British tubes (ie: Mullard or Brimar).

         Clear as crystal: Telefunken or Seimens.

         Somewhere between those: Bugle Boy, Amperex and some USA (RCA, Sylvania).

         Of course, you'd want to be certain; given their intended purpose (your pre/phono), they were tested for the lowest noise possible.

          Brent Jessee* would be my go-to, far as MY preferential/most trusted source.

          Here's a bit of wisdom, from a popular 6SN7 comparison, that's applicable to any tube circuitry, using multiples of the same tube:

          "One thing became clear based on customer feedback, combining 6SN7 types seems to work better than using all 6SN7s of the same type.

           With so many preamps and amps using this tube, you can end up with
Six 6SN7s per channel.

            It appears combining tubes like the VT-231s as voltage amplifiers and 6SN7Ws or 6SNGTA/GTBs as driver tubes you gain the strengths of all.  Using one type seems to accentuate the tube’s weaknesses."

                           *http://www.audiotubes.com/12ax7.htm

                                (Brent's on vacation until Aug 6)

                                 Have fun and happy listening!

           

 

            

           

           

 

 

@kevemaher -

 Sound is smoother, flows easier it seems. 

     Ain't it just great: the electromagnetic musical signal, freely flowing across a vacuum, rather than through semiconductors?

But not the big, enveloping warmth that people glow about. 

     Refer back to my recommendations, as regards the mentioned Brit tubes.   

     Also: my foremost motive, in citing Jessee's site, is that you read his descriptions, observations and opinions, when it comes to the various nations/continents of origin, time frames, OEMs and specific  iteration of a 12AX7 type valve's manufacture.

     One of my prime reasons for trusting him: our hearing must be quite alike.

     You'll still find that information/education invaluable; should you persist in the quest for a tubed amp.

                                              WHY?

                                     Glad you asked!

                      New production tubes just ain't got it!

  Maybe I'll find it with the power amp.

     As mentioned: you've two excellent/transparent/uncolored amps, in the Levinson and Bryston.    Either would convey whatever your particular taste desires.    Even: from session 2 session via a simple tube swap, should your heart be piqued, in that nice tubed preamp.

     Of course: the lid would have to be left off, to facilitate such a practice.

     But: It's been my experience the more air movement the typical component gets around it's innards, the happier it seems, overall.

     My own main amps are Carys, taking four 6550/KT88s per and since NOS Sylvanias, Tung-Sols and GEs supplies have either vanished or become unaffordable, to moi and the Svetlana St Petersburg plant burned down, with all it's equipment: my octet is now Russian Gold Lions.     They were found quite similar in every regard, to my GEs, but for a taste less Bass factor.   

      Quite listenable and why I didn't crack on the brand, in your preamp.

      They shouldn't get in the way, wherever you chose to try rolling better/NOS valves, anywhere in your pre, should you.

                           You didn't skimp on the analog setup.

       Don't lose the fidelity/quality of that source, through your preamp.

                                   DITTO: interconnects/cables!

     If frugal: your budget can easily cover all of the above, sate your taste for a warm/enveloping sound AND (if not already in your lexicon) provide or improve sound staging.

                                        Sorry for the verbosity!

                                             Happy listening!

 

    Forgot to mention: whatever diodes/rectifier your power supply uses; they can undoubtedly be improved upon.

    Given you're able/equipped to test for distortion, etc; I infer- you can solder.

                                                    Have fun! 

     When I was doing Dynaco; Joe Curcio was my go-to guy, if I needed advice.

                He's still in the game (AMAZING, after all these years)!

                            So's restored Dynaco gear, when done right.

                              http://www.curcioaudio.com/dynadr_3.htm