Receiver vs. processer?


I have a dedicated 2-channel system right now, but I am adding theater. Just bought a blu-ray and a plasma. Movies will be the main use, but I still have 2000 LP's and SACD's to listen to on occasion. My question is do I ditch the pre-amp (Classe) and power amp (Bel Canto Evo) for an A/V receiver or simply add a processor? Analog is an issue and I don't want to compromise my phono input too much. Are there any powered 5 channel processors out there, or am I looking at a power amp/processor combo? Any direction is greatly appreciated. Oh, and I'm not made of money, so Krell or similar high end brands are out. Thanks!
mranalog

Showing 1 response by ckoffend

The answer is completely dependant on whether 2-channel performance will be an important factor for you. If you are used to good 2-channel performance and want to maintain two channel but also have surround for movies, then keep your preamp and power amp and add a pre/pro and 3-channel amp. If you are more flexible and less demanding for 2-channel, get a pre/pro and amp(s) or a receiver. They are cheap, easily replaceable and not very good for 2-channel performance.

I have owned some of the nicest pre/pros and multi-channel amps and even a couple receiver/processors. None, and I repeat, none are very good with 2-channel performance if you have high demands. All, and I repeat all, were perfectly acceptable to my wifes standards for music. But she was able to tell the differences immediately between doing it the best way for 2-channel and just having 2-channel available.