Real world life expectancy of a high end cartridge?


While I know they’re supposed to last 1000 hours how many make it all that way?  

Question prompted by my brushing a knuckle on my AS Palladian this afternoon and trashing it ... lesson learned not to try tonearm adjustments without full access to the table (normally I move the table off the wall shelf to a more convenient location to make adjustments, but not this time 😬)

And doesn’t it just happen that the cost of a recipe/trade is exactly my deductible so even insurance is no help 😲

Anyway just needed to vent ... but anyone playing with these expensive baubles better be prepared to reup on a replacement at any moment 🤪
128x128folkfreak

Showing 4 responses by aspens

The analysis in the link below is most interesting. Empirical data and research is the best to get to the truth of matters. I have a partial bottle of Stylast but not used it in years; will start using what I have left.

https://www.head-fi.org/threads/stylast-stylus-treatment-no-placebo-here.771618/

On the other hand, see the * review on Amazon:

https://www.amazon.com/LAST-PRODUCTS-ST-Last-Treatment/dp/B004N8O8HQ/ref=pd_bxgy_201_img_3/136-20208...

Has anyone else experienced what he experienced?
Thanks for posting those instructions. I have both the cleaner and preservative, will use in that order.

A literature review and survey of stylus life was published on The Vinyl Press in mid-2019. Lots of detail, research, etc., in an article entitled "The Finish Line for Your Phonograph Stylus…" Reasonable reference to keep at hand. Interestingly, cartridge manufacturers have all gone to longer stated life than they did 30-40 years ago. Proof positive of this is with Ortofon (have used them since the 1980s) that back then in their owners manuals (see the VinylEngine) stated definitively 500 hours of life, now for the same diamonds, 2000 hours life. I personally find that disconcerting. Ortofon has refused my requests for research to back up their longer hour claims and other details when I have pointed this out to them.

Whether a stylus is high-end or not makes no difference. They are all fabricated from diamond (unless you use ruby stylus tips). Diamond is the hardest known substance on earth. The cut stylus can be from "aligned" diamond, meaning that even diamond has vector properties. Aligned along an internal crystal lattice face, a diamond will last a bit longer (spit-balling 10% longer) than those cut without that alignment. High-end cartridges are more likely to align their cut stylus in such a way.

A crucial aspect is VTF. If a cartridge is designed for 2.3 grams of VTF, it will not last as long as one designed for 1.8 grams. Shure back in the day did measurements on that, if you do a search. Finally, a diamond stylus has only a small contact with the vinyl, and I’ve seen it calculated what the force is for that small cross section. Its reported to be a surprisingly large load, actually.

Maintaining very clean records also prolongs stylus life, since the diamond is not "track grading" thought dust, including diamond dust, oils, and other debris. Ultrasonic cleaning and vacuum cleaning and resleeving is recommended and its how I do it.

Based on all that I have read, I am dubious of claims of stylus life beyond 1,000 hours of play on very clean records. I’m in the 700-800 range myself, tops, and I use high end cartridges. So I might recommend having the stylus examined by someone who knows what they are doing at that time of play. The change in sonics is ever so gradual, and we are used to it, how does someone really know their kit lasts 2,000 hours if they don’t have the stylus periodically examined?

Finally, I use Stylast. I have never seen published research that validates the 10x in extended stylus life. The best way to vet that is to show a photomicrograph of a worn diamond stylus at whatever hours that did not use Stylast. Then to show the same type of diamond on another life tip at 500 hours, 1,000, 1,500, 2,000, and so on to 10x life. While I use their products, that company has never really backed up their claims in a meaningful way. If I am wrong on that, please whomever knows post something to support their claims. My point, I want to know definitively.

Here is what the company says, this write up is fine, but in my view they need to publish the proof.