real horns or horn loaded what's the diff?


Hi Iam considering going to flee powered single ended amps.Since they need very efficient speakers I would like some input on whats better, the real horns like Altec Lansing and Klipsh,or horn loaded like the Lowthers? Do they sound different? I have only heard klipsh and Altec horns,I would be getting a new amp perhaps deware zen or maybe bottleheads S.E.X. amp both are only 2 watts or perhaps David Berings amp but it's only 1 watt.All the single ended triode people say that it's the best!! I would be replacing a pair of Martin Logan Aerius speakers.Can I please have some opinions? thanks ,Nick
happynick

Showing 2 responses by johnk

Your talking front and back loaded horn.A lowther or fostex in proper cabinet can make for a wonderfuly musical loudspeaker. They can be a bit weak at frequincy extremes but the vintage front horns you listed klipsch altec etc all sufer from this. 2 watts might not be enofe for a vintage front horn. If you have DIY skills maybe a lowther fostex would work for you. Keep in mind hi-eff just not fullranges and front horns, hi-eff ribbon loudspeakers are availible as are medium eff dynamics like audio note.
I think you will enjoy your system more with the small amp and a hi-eff loudspeaker. I owned most ML. My friends a dealer so I get to mess about with all the new ML designs.To me ML are far more colored than a proper hi-eff design.I can always hear this plastic resonance on most all panals. Plus integration between dynamic woofer and panal always is off.Best ML to me still is CLS 2Z. I did enjoy much of what they did or I wouldnt of kept buying stats for so long but to my ears a good hi-eff system is far better than a ML based.But with all things YMMV.