2. speakers
  3. 1132090190

Questions on Totem Hawks & Von Schweikert VR2

Hi. I am intersted in upgrading my current Vandersteen 1C speakers to a full-sized speaker that more closely matches my musical tastes (rock of all kinds, trip hop). My budget is around the $1500 mark used, and I am very happy with my current amp (Sim Audio I-5) and source (Sim Audio Nova), so I don't want to change them; I'm only considering changing my speakers.

I've done a lot of research here and elsewhere. Based on what I have read, I have narrowed my list to two speakers that I feel would be a good match for my system and my music: Totem Hawk & Von Schweikert VR2.

My living room is 22'x14'x8', but the listening area is more like 14'x14'. Other considerations include having to place the speakers no more than 18" from the long wall, the presence of small kids (ages 7 & 4), and that I live in an apartment. I don't generally blast my music, but do listen to "lively" music, so I want more "punch." I am still pleased with my Vandy's, but think that I can do better match-wise.

My concern with the Hawks relate to ease of being driven by the I-5's 70 wpc (I've read mixed things here), and my concern with the VR2s is the apparent need for them to be placed 2-3 feet from the wall (not possible for me). I am not interested in bookshelf speakers, and my reading has led me to these two speakers because of perceived quality, match with my music/equipment, size (smaller compared to my vandy's), value/price, and sonic characteristics. Any insights or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, - Steve
walkman

Showing 6 responses by walkman

walkman OP
50 posts
 
Interesting discourse there Rumadian. Thanks. I am learning mucho, and glad I started this thread. From what I have read, there does seem to be agreement that the VR2s are relatively harder to place correctly, but easier to drive (and therefore mate with other components) whereas the Hawks are relatively easier to place, but harder to drive (and therefore mate with other components). thx, - steve
walkman OP
50 posts
 
Thanks all for the prompt and informed responses. Much appreciated.

Interesting thoughts on the "volume" issue for the Hawks and the Forests. I contacted Totem, and they said that the Hawks would be a better fit with the I-5 than the Forests -- that the Forests would not be as dynamic sounding as they could be due to the (lack of high) power output from the I-5 -- even though the specs of the Hawks and Forests would suggest that the Forests would be easier to drive.

All in all, my concerns with the Hawks are driveability from my I-5, and my concerns with the VR2s are proximity to the rear wall. If others have heard both and can comment on preferred suitability to my music (which is not going to be blaring, but "is what it is"), then those thoughts would also be greatly appreciated.

In terms of my music, I'm not routinely playing heavy metal or thrash, but often listen to stuff like the Stones, Alice in Chains, Queens of the Stoneage, A Perfect Circle, REM, Morphine, Beck, Doors, Aimee Mann, Coldplay, Dandy Warhols, etc. and various Acid Jazz.

thx, - steve
walkman OP
50 posts
 
Thanks Matt, I appreciate the well-articulated reply...and suggestion on the Hawks. You hit several keys of mine on the head, speaking to synergy with my amp and source (and driveability, a potential concern I have based on some other posts I have read about the Hawks here), room size, and my tastes in music. And, you are correct in your assessment that I am trying to see what the next steps would be for me now regarding speakers. Coincidentally, maple would also be the finish of choice for me given my other furniture finishes. All in all, your post was most relevant...so, thanks!

Drubin: No, I have not considered moving up the Vandy line. While I do like my 1C's (I am not disappointed or frustrated, but am intrigued by a speaker upgrade/change that might better suit my musical tastes), I find the Vandy's to be a bit on the large size (as in width and footprint), and, all things being equal (which I know they are not), would like to have a smaller floorstanding speaker, but also one that has a reputation for being faster and more dynamic. I think the vandy's are more warm, relaxed and musical (all of which is good, but perhaps I'm seeking a different flavor).

thx again, - steve
walkman OP
50 posts
 
Thans Rumadian and Robm321. I appreciate the posts. It seems like I've narrowed down my selection to two recommended speakers, and yet there are always more...the more input, the better, so thanks again. - steve
walkman OP
50 posts
 
Yeah, Robm321, I had also read several posts here and elsewhere that the VR2s were kinda fussy in terms of placement, relative to other speakers...I found it interesting to read from Rumadian that he felt the VR2s were "much easier on placement," as that was one of my major concerns with the VR2s (e.g. distance from rear wall). - steve
walkman OP
50 posts
 
Thanks Lowfidelity...appreciate the suggestion and the link...I'll read it for sure. - steve
More to discover