Plinius 8200 v. Musical Fidelity Tri. v. SimI5

You're in luck, I have had owned the I-5, Plinius and Nu-Vista which is very similar to the Tri-Vista. All three are very good amps. I still have the Plinius and MF and think that the Nu-Vista is the best of the three. If I had to rank them, I would put the Nu-Vista first and then the Plinius and Sim and tied for second. All three are very good amps, but the MF is more refined, detailed and richer sounding than the other two. I feel like the MF is a combination of the Plinius' open airy sound and the Sim Audio's tight rhytmic presentation.

Truthfully, I would upgrade your speakers if you got the Musical Fidelity, and would considering upgrading soon if you got either of the other two amplifiers. If you need any more advice, please feel free to email me.

If you're looking for ultra transparency, highs and midrange that are simply wonderful (not to mention superb build).

What luck to hear from someone with experience of all three. Thanks for the suggestion on speakers. I will probably take you suggestion when the budget allows.
Ats

Even if Nu-Vista bests all Plinius 8200 used is the best bang for a buck with excellent phono.

I would go tubes with your b&ws, and probably would upgrade your speaks before plunking 2500 on an integrated.

The Plinius would probably work best, as the Sim is a brighter piece to go with B&Ws. I'm not a Musical Fidelity fan at all. The Classe integrateds go pretty well as to the MCs with B&W. And of course, some swear by Krell & B&W.

Aren't differing opinions great?