I prefer the PQ of plasma over LCD. For a tad more I went with a 55" Hitachi, which I thought was better than Panasonic, Samsung, Philips etc. The only plasma I saw that had a higher PQ was the Pioneer. However, it wasn't worth the extra dough given that I was getting approximately 95% of the Pioneer's PQ.
Plasma vs LCD help, which is better?
Getting a new TV.
Right now am torn between a 50" phillips plasma, 50 samsung plasma and a 46" samsung LCD. All about $3000. All are cable ready with digital inputs. I probably won't be using HDMI any time soon. Will the LCD hold up better to a lot of use? Will all of the extras on the phillips just cause more problems?
Thanks for any input.
By the way, prefer to buy local/new in pittsburgh.
Right now am torn between a 50" phillips plasma, 50 samsung plasma and a 46" samsung LCD. All about $3000. All are cable ready with digital inputs. I probably won't be using HDMI any time soon. Will the LCD hold up better to a lot of use? Will all of the extras on the phillips just cause more problems?
Thanks for any input.
By the way, prefer to buy local/new in pittsburgh.