Patricia Barber, Cafe Blue "un-mastered"


I thought I would write an opinion of the subject CD release. I won't call this a review since at this time I don't consider myself qualified to do a "review". I was perusing the Elusive Disc website and noticed a new version of this classic CD called UN-mastered. It is an SACD version which is billed as being as close to the original mix as possible. Wow, I thought, this has to beat the pants off my Premonition Records good old redbook CD! But how could it be any better? If you are familiar with this release, the audio quality is amazing.

I went ahead with the purchase looking to hear Ms. Barber and her band in even better clarity, crispness, presence, and sound stage.The liner notes say that this mix was done at Capital Studio's in Hollywood, "where the digital multi-track was mixed in the analog domain and the analog chambers were used to produce ambience and reverb" as described by Gus Skinas of the Super Audio Center.

I should note that my play back device is an Ayre C-5xeMP which is routed through a Plinius Tautoro pre and SA-103 amp. The amp drives Legacy Audio Focus speakers. I popped the disc into the Ayre and notice the SACD indication showing in the window along with the associated LED light indicator. I turned the volume up a bit and was immediately struck by how (please forgive me Ms. Barber) dry it sounded. I let the first track play through and thought, ok to be fair, I won't touch anything except to replace the SACD version with the redbook. I made the switch and there it was. That magical deep sound of the bass, the great vocals etc. I tried a few more tracks using the A/B method and came to the same conclusion after each one.

What was missing in this mix is the processing that normally occurs from the studio feed, reverb, delay, EQ, etc. This SACD sounds (and basically is) the studio feed without the processing, which is essentially a "live on tape" studio feed recording. There is some reverb due to the "analog chambers" whatever they are, but it is pretty much just as if you were hearing the musicians playing live in front of you with no sound treatment and in a studio environment where reflections and natural room acoustics are kept at a minimum. Now, I will admit that the overall recording quality is good, but this mix in my mind leaves a lot to be desired. Sorry Gus but I am very disappointed in this version. It does come in a great case though!    
128x128falconquest

Showing 4 responses by dlcockrum

The Premonition redbook CD and the MoFi SACD employ a tremendous amount of artificial reverb to her voice, to the point that she often sounds like she is located behind the instruments to my ears. A bit un-natural, but still a very good sounding CD/SACD and I enjoy it often, particularly the tracks that feature acoustical instruments without the vocals.

I have not heard the "unmastered" version, but suspect that it simply eliminates the added reverb based on reports, both favorable and not, just as you say falconquest.

Best to you all,
Dave
No flames Erik. Interested in your impressions upon re-listen.

Best to you Erik,
Dave
Good feedback, Erik. Musical taste is a personal thing. Probably the only thing in this hobby that is (or at least should be) beyond criticism or challenge.

I agree that the latter tracks are more enjoyable and find the sound quality of these tracks to be pleasing, but prefer "LIVE- A Fortnight in France" CD for this style of her music, both sonically and musically. Less molested thus much more realistic sounding IMO. Track 5 is particularly good. A reference for accurate depth of sound, excepting the ride and crash cymbals which were "spot miked" and move forward in the mix as well as placed too far apart here and there.

Overall, I find Holly Cole to be the superior vocalist for this type of vocal fusion jazz.

Thanks again for your feedback.

Dave