thinking about what you have heard, i’ll add this: in most studios things are immediately digitized and processed in the digital domain, using both digital mixing boards and more often ProTools software.
In the studio case, music -- often individual instrument tracks -- are typically sampled at 24/96, providing lots of headroom to process things without compromising fidelity (in theory). It also allows recording engineers to be sloppy since 16/44 only delivers 96 dB if level sets are done accurately, an art that seems to have been lost around 1968.
I, in fact, believe that it is in the studio where the benefits of HD are clear -- or clearest. Really well-done 16/44 can be pretty terrific - but that is often shown by 1960s-era verve, mercury or other recordings done simply on tube-powered analog tape machines by loving engineers (like Bob Fine).
In the studio case, music -- often individual instrument tracks -- are typically sampled at 24/96, providing lots of headroom to process things without compromising fidelity (in theory). It also allows recording engineers to be sloppy since 16/44 only delivers 96 dB if level sets are done accurately, an art that seems to have been lost around 1968.
I, in fact, believe that it is in the studio where the benefits of HD are clear -- or clearest. Really well-done 16/44 can be pretty terrific - but that is often shown by 1960s-era verve, mercury or other recordings done simply on tube-powered analog tape machines by loving engineers (like Bob Fine).