The harshness is also a limitation of the Thiel speaker. What I said: I use the Purist Audio LE 2013 powercable. Purist opens the mid freq. Totally no harshness in the Pl-200 from Monitor Audio. I played with the 30.5, 60.5 and 100.5 with the Pl-300 from Monitor Audio. The low freq. are awesome with the Pl-200. The cross over filter from the Monitor Audio are superior to the crossover filter of the Thiel loudspeakers. How do I know this? Very simple; the stage of the Pl-200 is a lot wider en deeper. Separation of instruments and voices is a lot better. |
I had them for some time. I also owned the XA-100.5 and 30.5. To be honnest for the money the 30.5 and 100.5 were better. These amps I used with the XP-20 Now I use the X250.5, overwhole sound I prefer a lot more over the XA60.5. The slamm and speed in the low freq are better. it is still a very warm and musical amp. It is a little bit more open than the XA60.5 The XA100.5 were a lot better than the XA60.5. The difference between the XA30.5 and XA60.5 is smaller. |
I thought I prefered the XA over the X series. I am not sure anymore. It has to do that I use the Purist Audio LE 2013 powercable. This gives me a much higher level out of the X250.5. I think I will go for the X600.5 later this year. There is a big difference in speed and slamm. Maybe the XA series are more warm sounding. Purist Audio powercables open up the mid freq a lot. Maybe this is the reason why I do not want to sound it more warm. I love the speed in the low freq. With both you cannot go wrong. One thing I know 100% sure, The next amp will be a Pass. |
No, In prefer 100.5 over X250.5. But in the setting I use now I prefer the 250.5 over the 60.5. That is why I will choose for the 600.5 later. XA has a more musical sound compared to X series. But the drive and speed do a lot with the Pl-200 speakers. Since I use the Audioquest Redwood 2013 version ( mid's/high's is full silver and low freq. is copper) the timing and speed advantage of the X250.5 have gone to another level. I understand that in other settings peolple need the overwhole warmer sound of the XA series. My tweeters go even above 100khz. There is no harshness in the high freq at all. Do not forget that even the XA100.5 has a lot of drive in the low freq. But it is the speed and more drive of the X series ( 0.5) what makes the sound more stunning in my setting.I also use the Acapella pure silver ballanced cables to my X250.5. These have also a very open mid freq. Like the Purist Audio 2013 LE powercable. In my settings the XA could become too much of it. These days I use the Onkyo PR-SC5509 with my own way of Audyssey Pro measurement. I did a lot of testing with Audyssey in the last 2,5 years. Now I have a wider and even deeper stage than with the XP-20 which I owned for 2 years. I have also more drive and a better separation of instruments and voices than what I had with the XP-20. Even wenn I play extreemly loud my needle is almost not moving. I can play till about 118 db with the Pl-200 with ease. I measure at totally different places and hights compared to they way Audyssey does. So I become a superior drive, speed, more resolution and a far better individual focus of instruments and voices. I have even more micro information. I can let people hear words endings of songs they thought they knew. Now they hear the word ending of these songs at a ss, ttt or th. You even hear people better breathing during singing. Because roomcorrection is only 1/3 of the whole Audyssey system how I use it. Now I can crush most pre-amp till 10.000 dollar with ease. I win in every part. More drive, wider and deeper stage, more resolution, better articulation, more natural sound and a much better individual focus of instruments and voices. I still play stereo the most these days. I never heard a touchable 3-dimensional image this convincing in my life before. I use it for stereo and multi channel clients. Many clients with expensive stereo pre-amps now play with the Onkyo PR-SC5509 with my Pro measurement. What I did was comparing it with there expensive pre-amps. It was that superior that they could not go back anymore. Audio is for me comparing and showing the best sound what is possible these days. I only can say: Mannnn I love it!! |
To Be honnest I found the INT models not the best what Pass Labs makes. Wenn instruments and voices become too big in proportion the distance between you and the music is getting bigger. Beause you will loose intimacy. Often at show's people use the wrong brand of cables for Pass Labs. A voice is sometimes even over 1.5 metre. Then I ask the persons who gives this demo ( in my world they are fools) how big is your head? MIT and Shunyata with Pass Labs makes voices and instruments too big in proportion. People first have to learn and understand how big voices and instruments are in proportion in real. I had these conversations a few times with the people from Pass Labs. Many are capable to f....up a show with ease. Sharp individual focus of instruments and voices are a key to the absolute sound. Because the level in invlovement and emotion is Always bigger than played too big in proportion. The same as the difference between 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional is a big difference!! |
I don't know them. In the US there are many cables which are not even here in Europe. |
I did test many brands which are not well known in the last 15 years. Most of the time they are not bad at all. But I never heard one what was exceptional good. The biggest difference between Audioquest and other brands are a few important parts. In the past I Always needed to use a few brands to get all the parts ( properties) in a set.
- deep stage
- wide stage
- sharp individual focus of instruments and voices ( many cables give an image with instruments and voices too big in proportion)
- open mid freq.
- controlled and deep low freq with all layers auditionable.
- good timing, low freq. need to be very short in attack.
- exceptional good blacks. Black is the space between the voices and instruments with there acoustic info of the room were they were recorded.
- lots of resolution and open high freq.
- no harsness in any freq.
- authorithy in the overwhole sound.
The DBS which many Audioquest cables use give a much better timing and more blacks. At this moment I did not audition any cable with this exceptional stunning blacks. Blacks give you a more 3-dimensional and tochable image. Audioquest give you all these parts what should be there in a well balanced system. Powercables of Audioquest are good but not exceptional. That is why I am not interested in them. Purist Audio makes superior powercables compared to Audioquest. |
The difference between Audioquest and Transparent is that the speed and blacks are better compared to Transparent. I heard there new cables at a show this year. I did not hear the level in blacks what the Audioquest can do. My new Redwood 2013 is even superior in speed compared to my old Valhalla. Attack in the low freq. are extreemly short. |
I Always say to clients; take your time and compare. I do the same ( a lot) so they should do the same. You only can spent your money once. |
I did not say Transpanrent would not work fine with Pass Labs. Transparent is also a brand what does not do anything wrong. Everything is there. I have enough clients with Transparant. Maybe you should try Audioquest once. In all the sets were I used a lot of Audioquest you hear the high level in 3-dimensional and touchable image. For me it is now easy to hear what it does and wenn it is being used. The level in touchable focus is the best I heard sofar. Instruments and voices are that much better separated and easier to point out. Most of the people who hear it say the same words; We never heard this level in touchable presence. I see you use the XP-20, which I used for 2 years. In the last few years I owned many different Pass labs power amps. I can crush a XP-20 with a Onkyo PR-SC5509 with my Pro measurement. I also invited Pass Labs wenn then are in Holland to come to me with a XP-20. I measure totally different what Audyssey does. I played for about half a metre beside the speakers with the XP-20. Now I play even wider. The biggest difference what I can make it that voices and instruments are better focussed and also there is more articulation of voices compared to the XP-20. I use recordings so it is more easy to understand for people. For example: Bruce Springsteen's Brothers under the bridge. The endings of his words are so open and clear that people are amazed how big the difference is. I can put all the different parts of the Audyssey settings to on and off. Roomcorrection is only 1/3 of the whole system. Wenn I compare the Audyssey way and my way of measurement; there is a lot more dynamics, more resolution, better separation and a better articulation. With my way of measurment the needle of a Pass amp starts to move only at extreme high volums. With my XP-20 it started much earlier. Audioquest makes my new level in sound even better. Would be nice to test the newest Audioquest cables and compare with the new Transparent cables. |
Yes it was identical, I only used the Pl-100 instead of the GXFX speakers. I used only Purist Audio LE 2013 powercables. For the rest it is identical. Audyssey EQ and Volume and my way of measurment gives me more dynamics and a far better articulation of info what is on a recording. But without the Audioquest the level in blacks is a lot lower. This is very important to make the 3-dimensional stage this thrilling. At the end you hear to all the parts. They are all important to get this level. Every tool ( speaker, amp, source, cable etc) I test I want to know which talents/properties it has. It is my goal to get all of the talents out of it. So I need and use other tools to get this level. |
I the last months I sold many Onkyo PR-SC5509 with my measurment to clients who had much more expensive pre-amps. Because the level I can get out of there sets is that much higher. Without this measurment it is worth a lot less. For example the tripod and the tool for the microphone Audyssey delivers is useless. I use all the knowledge I have gathered in the 15 years that I do this work. |
I have stunning results in both 2 channel and Multi channel. I use it and sell it both in stereo and in Multi channel. I prefer it over the XP-20 from Pass Labs even in stereo use which I had for 2 years. I talked about this several times with Pass Labs. My stage is even deeper and wider than I had with the XP-20. The Onkyo with Audyssey Pro has a more sharp individual focus of instruments and voices. But that is not even the most surprising part. 2nd and 3th voices on recordings are a lot more easy to follow. Because the articulation is better. I never heard 2nd and 3 th voices this clear. It is the same with instruments. For every person it is that easy to focus on every single part of the recording. |
No the phono section is not that special. You have to hear it how unique the Onkyo PR-SC5509 with my measurement is. Because I would not believe wenn someone would say this story. I would say it is the biggest bullshit I ever heard. I understand that it is difficult to believe. I have plans to modify the Onkyo with better parts later this year. The person who does my technical support is exeptional good in technique. He modified many expensive amp's and sources from clients. I think we can reach even a higher level. |
I did use this one also a little at the show. I tested it also at home. It is good, but it is not exciting. Without Audyssey Pro you stay in a different world. During the show I used my Samsung Plasma ( 64 inch) as a screen. I can put the different parts of the Audyssey system to on and off. Wenn I do not use anything of Audussey anymore the party is over. Drive, speed, sublime focus, dynamics and resolution are lost for a very big part. With the XP-20 I had very good results in dynamics, focus, resolution and in a wide and deep stage. But now every part with the way I measure I can top all of it. I learned to use Audyssey from a highend perspective. Audyssey is focussed on a different way. Those results are good sometimes but never thrilling. The way they use it you still loose too much. This part I did improve a lot. Wenn you build a surround system you first start with the stereo part. From stereo you build to Multi channel. The reason is very simple. Wenn every part in stereo is right it is easier to get it right in Multi channel. I have a lot of music on bluray these days and I love it. But I still play the most in stereo. |
