Parasound vs. Krell for 2 channel


Hey there - primarily a HT guy here. lately I have been listening to much more music though. I got JTR speakers but I love their sound/fullness for music. I have been running a Krell Chorus 5200 for 3 years. Love it, but recently added side surrounds. Grabbed a stereo D-Sonic to cover me...and tried it for my LR. I personally thought it felt a little thin/weaker, so I decided to switch back to the Krell for LR. So, I'm wondering if I should just keep it as is, or try to improve my 2 channel a bit. Would a Parasound A21+ sound "better" than the Krell? I have heard the Parasound has great control of bass response in mains, and that many people love their sound. I heard one once w/ Martin Logans and loved it. I also wonder if having 5 channels in the same box isn't as effective. I thought about going Jc1 mono blocks, but I don't have the space. Sorry this was so Long winded, LOL. But to all you out there smarter than me - should I check out a Parasound or just stick w/ Krell? thanks!
128x128ethos4lyfe

Showing 3 responses by auxinput

The Parasound is going to be significantly different in sonic signature.  You will definitely notice this on movies.  The Parasound is a very slightly warm and dry sound.  The Krell Chorus 5200 is a sweeter smoothed over sound.  The "clinical" description that oldhvemec stated is really on the older Evolution series amps.
A note on Class D amps with switching power supplies.  Even though the amp will produce more watts per channel, the switching power supply can limit the strength of the bass.  This can be why the D-Sonic sounded thin/weak in comparison to the sliding-bias Class A Krell amp with a linear power supply.

This is likely way over your budget, but there's a Krell Duo 300 amp in audiogon for $4900 or best offer.
There's a Chorus 7200 also on audiogon.  You could get that and then sell your 5200.