One speaker observation from the New York Hifi show.


I was just at the New York Hifi show, and perhaps because of the size of the rooms, all speakers were toed in, and most were toed in severely. The result was very little effective imaging.  Most sound appeared to come from one central spot between the speakers.  I realize hotel rooms are not ideal, but even in the larger rooms, noticible toe ins were prevalent  I don’t believe this positioning shows systems off to their best advantage.  To me, speakers pointing straight ahead produces the best imaging.
128x128rvpiano
And since I read a little above about the distancing, I have a question. What about an infinite baffle system? Are there drawbacks to such a design? Your still dealing with refraction and such from five planes. But not that pesky sixth that is behind the transducers forward wave, "And wave diodes on four", especially if cylindrical in nature.
  Thoughts??
I think the "Periodic Baffle" utilizing charged, non-congruent planes will solve most of our "Audiophile distress syndrome" in the near future.
    Hee hee, Imagine transients at lightspeed! Delta-Y! Here we come!
In my experience it is impossible to hear anything at an audio show due to the non-stop yacking by all the patrons. I go for the tchotchkes.
If you have a small or small-medium room like me, i suggest using a sealed speaker. I am new to hifi. Discovering a nht superone 2.1 and zero 2.1 are aweone. I can place these a few inch away from wall and get amazing sound with very good bass from superone.
I have electrostatic highbred speakers (Martin-Logan Summitt X) - any  thoughts on distance from The wall behind the speakers or the side walls? And toe in?
Different speakers require different placements.  Speakers that radiate front and back differ from box speakers.

There is no universal “Best”, it all relates to the speaker type and room.

within the world of Maggies there is always debate about tweeters inside or outside placement.