OK, so I have to ask. Is this real, or is this a joke?

@mijostin "Show us some data demonstrating improved conductivity. lower noise, something. Your ears are extremely poor test devices. They are weak and extremely inaccurate just like most of us. If you can hear it then a test device can pick it up."

On the other hand, if you haven’t purchased it , tested it and documented the outcome yourself how can you state that anyone that has purchased it actually can not hear an impact? Rather than require others to prove your point prove it yourself and disclose

@mijostin

" No, I am not going to waste my money on something for which there is no reasonable explanation of function regardless of what anyone hears and I guarantee that I will loose a lot less money over time and have a much better sounding system because I’m spending the money on things that actually work like better cartridges, amps, speakers and test equipment."

There are a lot of folks on this Forum who, no different than you, have/are investing a lot of money on better equipment to get a better sounding system (check out the virtual systems). What is different is that they have found by listening vs testing that making investments in tweaks such as this provide further incremental benefits. They are not sacrificing one investment for the other. Maybe it is time to just agree to disagree, different approaches some are satisfied with listening while you and some others require testing. Come the end of the day what matters is which approach works for the individual making the decision, this isn’t life or death no one needs saving