Ohm Walsh Micro Talls: who's actually heard 'em?


Hi,

I'd love to hear the impressions of people who've actually spent some time with these speakers to share their sense of their plusses and minuses. Mapman here on Audiogon is a big fan, and has shared lots on them, but I'm wondering who else might be familiar with them.
rebbi
YEs, I find with the OHMs, it is much like making really good soup. All the ingredients matter and attention to detail 9and some patience) is the key to getting really good results.

Foster, I know all teh gyrations you have gone through so I am very happy that your patience and attention to detail appears to be paying off.
BTW, after bringing in the 100S3s and later the 5S3s, the only part of my system at the time that did not change as well towards the goal of optimizing performance was my Linn Axis turntable, speaker wires and Denon103R cart. Everything else changed including amp (twice), pre-amp + phono pre-amp, DAC and ICs. So pretty much nothing remained the same. But it was all worth it.....
I just found this thread and had to voice my experiences with Ohm speakers.
My first experience with anything Ohm happened around 1974 when I purchased a pair of Infinity Monitor speakers. These speakers used an inverted Ohm tweeter, a mini Ohm speaker (maybe 3 inches tall?) mounted upside down. The only problem is I kept blowing them. The guy at the stereo place was getting tired of replacing the drivers and offered to let me try out some Ohm F's. I take them home and set them up (I had no idea what I was doing). I had a Phase Linear 400 amp that I drove them with. They sounded very good but seemed like they were missing something so I took them back and got the other speakers. As soon as I got back and hooked those up and turned them on, I knew immediately I had made a big mistake. The Ohms were far superior. Not only that, there isn't a more fun speaker to watch work!!! :-)

The mid 80's rolled around and I started moving to CD's. I needed a new stereo setup since my old one was long gone. So I purchased a pair of Walsh 4's and a Carver M1.5t amp and 4000t preamp. It was like a match made in heaven. The Walsh 4's could take just about anything the M1.5t could throw at them (I would routinely push 500 - 600 watts per channel at them) without strain. I was reading here about the lack of low bass punch with Ohms. Ohms need power and lots of it. To get an Ohm to open up and sound like they should requires good clean power. My 4's are currently sitting in storage with blown drivers (thanks to my kids when they were younger) awaiting the new Walsh 5 upgrade. In the mean time I've had 2 pairs of Walsh 2's in my living room. While they don't have the same punch or tonal quality as the 4's, they sound excellent. At first they sounded a little muffeled until I got brave enough to crank in the power. Once I did, the memories of the 4's started coming back. While they can't handle the power and start to sound strained when really pushed, I've listened to high quality recordings at natural levels with them and they are very easy to listen to. The sound stage is vintage Ohm with everything placed precisely.

I blew one of the 2's by accident. My receiver was out for repair and I use the Carver M1.5t for the front channels. I had a direct connection from my laptop to the amp when the mini stereo plug fell out. The amp graciously allocated all of it's power to that speaker and... well, just say Walsh 2's don't like 750 watts at once.

But all is not lost, just ordered another pair of Walsh 2's off of eBay for $240 until I can save up for my Walsh 5000 upgrade.
But based on what I've heard, I won't be changing speaker brands, I love my Ohm's!
As side note, I'm ordering the 5000 upgrade for my Walsh 4's today! Can't wait!! John is taking both pair of Walsh 2's for a trade in. As soon as I get them in, I give them a write up here.
Congrats Steve, you are in for a real treat! Will be waiting to hear how they come out. How long of a wait for them? Enjoy! Tim