Odyssey kismet - emotiva xpa1 1000w ?


Have had 3 weeks with the kismet monos, please help me  with how a 200W mono pair can sound better, and not get hot, and seem relaxed and clearer than a 1000W pair of monoblocks??

  Driving at about 3.6- 4.9:ohm load. 
These 200W odyssey maps, seem to keep up with everything, faster, less fatiguing, and still overpower the 1000W amps,

 please, explain, so I understand the theory how 200W can sound better!and drive my speakers better than maps with 5X the power.

thanks
arcticdeth

Showing 1 response by auxinput

Heat is always usually a byproduct of how much Class A bias the amp output board has.  If you are references the older generation Emotiva (Such as XPA-1 Gen 2), then the bias is a bit high (maybe 8-10 watts into Class A).  I suspect the Odyssey is biased very low, probably less than 1 watt, so there isn't a lot of heat generated unless you push the amp really hard.

Also, the Emotiva amps do have a tendancy to sound bright, even with the older generation.  The new Gen 3 amps do sound bright and do not have a natural sound, plus they have hollow sounding bass because of switching power supply.  The Gen 3 amps also do not really get hot.

The older Gen 1 or Gen 2 amps have a full linear power supply.  I think you are talking about these because they can get a little bit hot.  They also are bright sounding stock, but this can be fixed with a fuse upgrade.  The bass on these older amps are very strong and powerful.

The Odyssey amps are very simple amp circuits with a small amount of components and Klaus uses very high quality components (capacitors, etc.).  The Emotiva line uses the cheapest caps/resistors/wiring it can obtain with a generally good design to get a "good for the money" result.  It works in general, but the latest Gen 3 amps are more compromised than the older ones because of that dang switching power supply.