Not Another NuForce thread......


Ok, first I am not shill or related to, or affiliated with NuForce in any way...I just thought that we should have a thread to discuss the V2...

I just placed the Reference 9 SE "V2" in my system after living with the NuForce 9 SE for the past year and auditioning the Reference 9 V2 for the past 2 months...

I am putting out there for comment and debate that the Reference 9 SE V2 is one of the top 5 best amplifiers out there and currently available. (I personally think that it one of the top 3, but I am leaving room for argument)

Sitting in my room last night I was reminded of one of those transforming audio experiences. My first ones was couple of hours with the Sinus Faber Amati Homage pushed with a full compliment of the top of the line ML gear all with in a perfectly treated room....My experience with the Reference 9 SE V2 was like that...

Please comment if you are able on the V2 in general, what was your experience?? Are your thought of the Reference 9 SE V2 the same??
jb8312

Showing 1 response by dazzdax

It is still peculiar to me that there is an evident dichotomy among the audiophiles who like and don't like NuForce (and other class D amps with or without built in switch mode power supply). Many proponents say: "Wow, those amps can easily beat over US$10,000 amps", while the opponents say: "The whole technology is bad. It is an immature technology full of pitfalls and shortcomings. The treble response sucks big time. Avoid them as the plague, etc.". I haven't seen such an extreme polarization within the audiophile community as in this case. Even in the case of solid state vs tube debate audiophiles are less polarized, in that most of them are aware that both technologies have their own benefits and shortcomings. I'm wondering what actually is the cause this dichotomy regarding the digital vs conventional amp technology.

Chris