Sounds quantum and interesting.
I shall have more of a read although there is not much to read... total contact electrical contact enhancer
I shall have more of a read although there is not much to read... total contact electrical contact enhancer
New Tweak --- Its Fantastic
Sounds quantum and interesting. I shall have more of a read although there is not much to read... total contact electrical contact enhancer |
Just as a comparison, this one is graphene based also, MSA Graphene Contact Enhancer, although I am sure that it is a little different but the cost is much less. this one does not look as permanent. any thoughts about both of them? |
A skeptic..what’s wrong with that?if you haven’t tried it then really you are a poor skeptic and a nay sayer, and if you are really vocal then you are an unreasonable skeptic and nay sayer. Flat earth comes to mind and measurable proof isn’t always easy. In fact, I would say that there is no measurable proof but it definitely appears to be very audible. Sorry in advance, just my thoughts. |
So, how can a skeptic be a person who has any experience with any product that is under discussion?It would appear that you need proof, which is reasonable, but perhaps measurable proof isn’t available or easy to obtain and the measurable proof available is that it definitely appears to be very audible, by peoples ears. If TC works, for people, then compared to mega dollar component/speaker upgrades, this tweak is quite reasonable. I always trust my ears because my ears (and my brain) have to live with the resulting music reproduction, but it is nice that others have spent some money and time, and given there opinions on the musical result. |
I guess, without you knowing it, you made my case by (your own words). ’’There WAS the gobblygook", but you know this..right?nope, not at all and you are clearly wrong. TC appears to be gobblygook to you and interesting how you have interpreted the posts but your interpretation is dramatically incorrect and even rude. Why do you want everyone to support your unfounded opinion when you haven't even tired TC? This is really quite unreasonable, don't you think so? Until I try it, I am happy to read other posters opinions and continue to ask, hopefully, reasonable questions. |
jay23, have you tried the product? If no, why are you posting because there is really no need for you to post these negative posts. These sort of posts are really quite disrupting to the thread and are really not reasonable.
One person has tried it and didn't like it enough and posted that it dulled his system. If you do not want to try TC that is reasonable. If you want it for free, well, that probably won't happen, which is reasonable. If you are thinking about purchasing it then like me and others it is probably best to simply read the posts about the performance of TC and hopefully glean enough information about TC, and peoples systems, to try it or not. |
I have, however, heard a ton of UNexpectation bias though ... all from those who haven’t seen the product, touched the product, heard the product or used the product.yes, it is annoying, isn’t it TC seems to be a good product, one poster found it not god enough, and several to many posters have found it really good |
2017-I install my friend’s latest cables, the SR blue fuse and TC without changing the room treatments. My wife finds the Focuses sound to bright and aggressive. Reason-the openess exposed the bad slap echo and other acoustic problems in my room. 2018-Solution-SR HFTs (2 sets), SR speaker kits (1 pair) and removable of all baffles, diffusers, other hard surfaces in the room. Result-she likes listening to her music again.there are alot of changes mentioned. did they all need to happen at the same time. do you think that you could have achieved the same results with less changes? it is not really clear what TC has done in this case? more resolution usually means more room excitement, although not always, and room changes or treatments can change the sound alot. |