"...Einstein stubbornly refused to change his views until his death many years later."He changed it then???
New Omega E Mat from Perfect Path Technologies
Many of you own or have read of the highly-regarded PPT Omega E Mat, one of Tim Mrock’s revolutionary signal-enhancing accessories. Just prior to his untimely passing, Tim had finished developing a new generation of his Omega mat, soon to be available. Krissy Mrock has asked a few of us to introduce this new mat, here given the working title of The Double Omega.
In distinguishing the Double Omega, we know the original Omega, herein called the single, as a 7.5” by 10”, rather heavy and somewhat pliable mat, a bit more than 1/8” thick and with a vinyl-like feel. One face is glossy white, displaying the PPT logo and Omega name, while the other is black, smooth and magnetized. Sandwiched between these faces is the active material that causes components to reject the EMI that saturates everything in our surroundings. The Double Omega is much the same, with one important difference: the magnetized face has the finely-textured feel of around, say, 220-grit sandpaper. This texture, it is presumed, comprises yet a second active layer of EMI rejection. Presumed—because working details of the Double Omega are not well understood—better yet to know how to apply it.
With the understanding that the single Omega E mats generate field effects from both faces, mats have typically been placed under and over components and vertically over circuit breakers. How you apply the Double Omega will depend on best use and experimentation. In my case, I have removed two single mats, lying side-by-side, from the top of my large Wadia CDP and have replaced those with two Double Omegas. The Wadia is a one-box player that contains a pre-amp, so I wanted that second, strong field effect exerting downward as well as upward. I also have several singles placed underneath, just as before. Going straight to amps, this player is my only source, so I want it fully protected from EMI. Your priorities will differ.
As of this writing, I am only thirty-hours in on placing these Double Omegas, and I can already tell you they are powerful in their prevention of EMI within my digital source. Yet another veil has been lifted—all instruments and voices are even more sorted out in the aural space with new information heard within that space. There is much more decay heard against a new silence behind and between the musicians. I am already so pleased and excited about what the Double Omega E mats are doing. As Krissy told me, Tim was really stoked to have these new mats available. Rather than wait for the the fourteen-day window of improvement, I want to get this intro out so others can relay their experiences sooner.
Showing 38 responses by glupson
oregonpapa, Copying CDs for another person is not criminal mindset. It is actually an act. In just one post, you showed you are willing to do things that are not right/legal making honesty of all your claims very doubtful. In that same post, by announcing your misdeeds on an open Internet forum, you revealed very unusual, but definitely poor, judgment. And readers are to believe your claims about the mat? Santa Claus is way more believable. He does not steal. |
If everyone can post their favorite videos, lyrics, or links to similar music-(un)related items, I hope I can do it, too. This is what I grew up with. Great stuff. (disclaimer: I actually bought the record) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_sXGBoXvhiw |
Above posts make me wonder. If a brand new, fully legal and copyrighted, CD can be had for less than $20, isn’t Omega+ Mat overpriced at $600? For example, Neil Diamond’s Hot August Night can be bought for a few dollars on Discogs and brand new for around $13 on Barnes & Noble website. Is it really necessary to pay $600 for the Mat to enjoy the CD that costs tiny fraction of that money? |
Remember, the product is sold "no questions asked, full refund if you’re not satisfied."Is it? The only place it says so, that I could find after reading other poster's question about it, is one post on this thread. There is no "return policy" specified I could find on the PPT website. Where exactly is it? |
oregonpapa, I did not plan to go anywhere with you. I just noticed your apparent disdain for laws and remembered you said something about your, I think, brother being a detective or a police officer and always suspicious. I might have misunderstood. Those were really some other times, if movies are representative of them. The colors were pleasant. I mean, I am relatively familiar with Technicolor. Elizabeth Taylor was a big name but I remember her mostly from the stories about being married eight times. Or something like that. One was Richard Burton. Only recently, I watched her movie with James Dean. She was good. |
oregonpapa, "He has the SR HFT’s glued to his windshield and headliner." I do not know who David Pritchard is, but if he is anywhere in the State of California, you may want to let him know so he can check it out... 26708. (a) (1) A person shall not drive any motor vehicle with any object or material placed, displayed, installed, affixed, or applied upon the windshield or side or rear windows. http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=VEH§ionNum=26708. |
"He’s tricked his car out with both SR and PPT products."You said it. Are you confident to do that, too? No matter what you do, do not put Omega+ Mats on the windshield. I know they are supposed to be good anywhere you put them, but please do not do that. Regardless of how confident you are in that trick. |
oregonpapa, If that’s your idea of "music," then a lot of questions have been answered.When it comes to Sex Pistols, try My Way. If you cannot feel it, regardless of what you are listening to it on, the age has gotten the best of you. Publicity stunt, or not, play it loud. When it comes to substituting guitars for saxophones, I do not have much knowledge but there were certainly great guitar players in the 1920s, if not even earlier. For whatever reason, in the places where blues was played, I do not recall ever seeing a saxophone. They might have been there, but I do not remember them. Of course, that was much much later and landscape might have changed. All of that is another topic for another time. |
oregonpapa, It was likely not me in your high school. Just from your stories, I am guessing I was born way after that. It is true that my home was, and still is, always open and full of people, but nobody lures them in. They come all the time, uninvited more often than not. As far as nerdy goes, well, I would rather think of it as over-educated. I barely studied, though. Didn't you say your brother was in law enforcement? I guess, on average you are just like any other family. Every family has a black sheep. |
uberwaltz, "I am pretty sure that we are Gluppy but the more important question to my mind is...... Why are you?"It is beyond entertaining. It is now turning into science. Reading about all the positive properties of these mats, which is all of them as negative do not exist, I cannot but wonder why they are not called Batmats. |
rsf507, You are right, I did not think about that. Still, quick search shows some of those speaker sales in low $1000s. Considering that, even $3000 in mats seems to be unusual. Despite of what (incorrect) image I have here, I was wondering would investing those $6000, even $3000, into newer speakers be better. That particular model seems to be very old (someone on the Internet mentioned he had them from late 1990s). Even the latest samples must be years old now. Technology has evolved and all the parts eventually age. Maybe buying a two or three year old speakers now would not be completely bad idea. Of course, that would take away the fun of playing with different parts, for the same money, so it would depend on what someone is really looking for in all of this. |
oregonpapa, "At this point, I’m up to five Omega + E Mats on each speaker..."Is it still those Legacy Audio Signature III speakers pictured in your virtual system? If yes, those speakers were around $4500 many years, if not more than a decade or two, ago. They probably go for much less these days. Omega Mats you are using are $6000. Nothing wrong with having a hobby, but it would definitely be an unusual approach. Did you change/upgrade the speakers? |
oregonpapa, Reviews for your speakers seem to be very favorable, at least for the times they were published. My "concern" is that they do age and slip in performance. That is inevitable but it has to depend mostly on luck. With some luck, they may go another 15 years with no problem. With less luck, everything will dry out. It is great that it works for you this way, and the logic is clear. Still, it must be a rare approach. Cars are more often approached that way (money pits that improve performance with some tweaks eventually costing way more than the original car itself). |
oregonpapa, I am surprised by your impression that I know a ton about speakers. That is a major misunderstanding on your part and I have no idea how it came to be. I barely know how speakers work. Ok, I know how they work as well as most of you. Which is "barely", it seems to me by reading what people post around here. I have a few different pairs of speakers. I mostly use camouflage JBL Charge 3+ (notice the + in the name), but I do have green iHome Go+ Arc (what is with these +es in fancy equipment these days?) and SONY SRS X33 (blue). I also have Revel speakers, Mission speakers, and a few more that have not been touched in a while. I am even very familiar with progeroid properties of Acoustic Research 18s although they might have been an extreme. |
Newer Revels are less than two years old and another pair is from 2005, August 1st, to be exact. Missions are from 1994, also August. Another set of Missions I have no idea how old they are. JBL Charge is from this spring and iHome and SONY from fall 2015. Acoustic Researchs still work despite me fixing them. There is something else, but it escapes my memory now. I doubt any would be called "classic". It is all disposable junk. As far as electronics goes, for JBL, I mostly use its own amplifier with iPod Touch 5th generation as a source running Internet radio. Speakers aside, most of the time music is from SONY Walkman via earphones. I am not a tube guy. I am too young to be a tube guy without being pretentious. Not to mention, it is cumbersome. |
thecarpathian, "Your last post was just plain cold hearted and unnecessary.Some weeks ago I suggested that Omega Mats be used to, quite literally, ease the world’s energy problems. Your (plural, maybe not you personally) descriptions about refrigerators and whatever else working better were the source of that thought. The next thing I know, someone said that the inventor actually had some thoughts in that direction. Aligning his thoughts with mine, not with yours. So, yes, if the company is folding and there are no patents to be found, it is a business opportunity on a majestic scale and for the greater good. In fact, the person closest to the inventor could capitalize on it big time, too. If all that had been said so far were true. Unfortunately, earlier in one of these PPT threads, I was insulted and demeaned for my attempts to emphasize that a swift business plan and action were needed at that moment, if the business were to survive in some form. You all laughed at me. Instead of helping organize listening sessions in targeted locations, etc. you continued feeding each other in a very small forum. Waste of time/resources. My insistence on patent number, at that time, was exactly to assess/anticipate what might be saved in case the situation like this happens. And what exactly did you do to help in the long run? You could not see it coming? |