Network optimization for serious streamers


In my ongoing experiments, now going on seven years, with network optimization for streaming I've discovered a number of optimizations that should work with any ethernet ISP.

 

I've tried a variety of ethernet cables, modems, routers, switches, FMC, ethernet filters, the following is what I've found to be most effective optimizations.

 

I'll start with ISP quality and speed. Recently I discovered 500mbps to be preferable to 300mbps. Along with upgrade in speed, modem capable of 1gb service replaced 600mbps, both have Broadcom chips and powered by same lps. Can't say which more responsible for improvement, speed or modem, presume speed has at least some role in ping time. As for ISP, there is importance in ISP server geographic location to you, shorter distances  means lower ping time. For information as to how ping time affects jitter-https://www.fusionconnect.com/speed-test-plus/ping-jitter-test

 

Now for modems,  modem close to audio system is most favorable, extending coax cable preferable to long ethernet cable. Coax more resistant to rfi and closer positioning to system means one can more easily afford top quality ethernet cable for modem to router connection. The modem should use Broadcom chipset vs. inferior Intel Puma, Broadcom chipset has lower jitter vs the Intel. Modem should be powered via external lps using quality DC and AC cables, lps to power conditioner for ultimate performance.

 

Following close positioning of modem to audio system, router should also be placed near modem in service of same advantage of making highest quality ethernet cable more affordable, in this case, modem to router and router to switches, streamers and NAS. Router should be powered with lps, this lps should be able to provide more amps than router requires in service of providing greater reliability, having lps with reserves of amperage means lps runs cooler, heat is enemy of reliability, longevity. As with modem, quality dc, ac cables and connection to power conditioner.

 

The next finding is new to me, provides very meaningful upgrade to streaming sound quality. Noise from wifi, injected both internally to router and externally with routers sitting close to audio systems has long been a concern to me. I have quality Trifield meter which measures rfi, router with operational wifi manufacture obscenely high levels of rfi, rfi is noise, noise is enemy of streaming at level we're talking about here. And its very likely the more wifi devices one has in home the higher the levels of rfi produced. This noise is then injected into following cables and streaming equipment. One may convince themselves FMC totally isolates this noise, and while correct, it doesn't mitigate the noise and masking going on within router. The only way to eliminate this noise is turning off wifi. And then, how to provide wifi for the many  wifi devices we have at home? The answer is to connect a second router to the primary router. The primary router will only provide ethernet for streamers, switches and/or NAS in audio system, also for the second router.  Second router provides wifi for the home, this scheme keeps vast majority of rfi out of audio system streaming chain. My own measurements find rfi significantly diminished in primary router, more than mulitiples of ten times lower vs wifi enabled. This was seamless install with the Netgear routers I'm using. There may also be value in provisioning higher quality routers. My new primary router, Netgear XR1000 is marketed as a gamer router, claims of lower ping time, latency, jitter vs other routers. Since my old router, Netgear RS7000 didn't have means to monitor ping time I can't provide evidence of this claim. Whatever the case, my XR1000 ping time test measurements are as follows, 25.35ms highest, 16.50ms lowest, this is A+ measurements against objective criteria. Ping time under load is download 25.93ms, upload 37.34ms, idle 17.31ms, this rates as A. My speed of 565gbps rates B grade, likely need 1gb service to get A here. At to how this all pertains to sound quality, adding up the upgrade in ISP speed and the off loading of wifi is without a doubt one of the most substantial, if not most substantial network upgrades I've experienced. While I  long considered my setup as having a vanishing low noise floor, with this setup I heard a new level of vanishing if such a thing is possible. Even more astounding was a more analog like presentation, while I wasn't aware of even the slightest digital presentation prior, this upgrade certainly exposed it was indeed there. It seems logical to conclude there has been some lowering of jitter here.

 

And then we come to the ethernet filter. I suppose audiophile switches can be considered as one, then we have actual filters such as Network Acoustics Muon, my JCAT Net XE and others. I continue to believe these necessary even with the all measures above.

 

Optical conversion is also valid approach post router. While I found generic FMC somewhat effective, at this point I prefer ethernet. On the other hand I've not yet tried optimizing a fiber solution, for example two Sonore OpticalModules, both powered by lps, further upgraded with Finisar optical transceivers.

 

Assuming one has high resolving audio and streaming systems the above network optimizations should provide for substantial sound quality improvements. In my system, perception of performers in room has been taken to a new level of intimacy, meaning a more emotional connection to the performers and performance.

 

At this point, I consider network has been fully optimized, the only upgrade I'm aware of would be ISP upgrade to 1gb.

sns

Showing 10 responses by thieliste

@macdude My analog are all Cardas Clear Beyond.

I'm getting a Vertere Pulse HB LAN cable very soon.

I use a generic optical module from Afterdak and a Sonore optical module Deluxe v2 between my Paul Pang Quad Switch and my Aqua LinQ streamer.

Both optical modules are on LPS.

Ethernet cables are the Pink Faun Lan cables and will add some FTA Metis.

I have some of the best SFP pairs : Finisar 1321, 1318, 1324, 1475 and Cisco 10G.

I also have a Ubiquiti Edgerouter X SFP that i have yet to experiment between my ISP modem and PP Switch.

Wifi on ISP modem is off.

@sns That’s right most resolving and precise are the Finisar 1318 and even more the 1475.

Cisco is creamy and musical and not very resolving.

Most liquid sounding is the Finisar 1321.

I use Phoenix Contact glass fiber single mode.

@sns Yes they do sound a little harsh in the first few days, within 2 weeks they are well burned in.

I do have stock SFPs and find them really bad compared to some of the best Finisars.

@sns Just to let you know i've had a lot of drop outs lately using the Finisar 1475 paired with the Sonore Optical module.

Since 1475 is SFP+ there might be incompatibility problems with Sonore optical gear ?

Anyway i went back to Finisar 1318 and everything works fine with this one and it's just as good as the 1475.

Yesterday been comparing Finisar 1421BTL, 1324BTL and 1318BTL.

I much prefer 1318 over the other 2, it is much more resolving, has more slam and a wider soundstage.

1318 is basically at the same level as 1475 IMO, 1318 can still be purchased new at Mouser.

My server is a fanless Roon Rock NUC powered by a Farad super 3 LPS going into my PP Quad Switch and off to Aqua LinQ streamer with HQPlayer core module.

 

I own those upraded Finisar offered by Sonore, i was not impressed at all and therefore do not use them anymore they are far behind 1475 and 1318.

I would be tempted to try out the Startech SFP1000ZXST if anyone has compared them please share.

@lollipopguild It's actually 1421P1BTL but it's not the best one.

You should get 1318P3BTL, it's the one i'm using very close to 1475 highly resolving.

If you want more musical, creamier than go for Finisar 1324P2BTL or Cisco 10G.

For Finisar always get the BTL versions the other ones are not as good.

I'm demoing the Vertere Pulse HB LAN cable in my system right now.

This is the most insane Ethernet cable i've ever heard to date, it completely smoked both Pink Faun and FTA Metis LAN cables in my system.

We're talking a full component upgrade type of performance here.

You guys should take a look at this cable if you can afford it but beware there is no going back once you have heard it.