Great responses and advice Rar1. Not to hijack anyone's thread, but I think you've answered the question very well. Maybe this will apply to Andreas as well but I've had similar thoughts lately trying to decide if going from the C320BEE (which I am very happy with) to the C352 would be enough of an upgrade to worry about. I think I could go from the C320BEE to either the C352 or C370 for around $100. Does the same logic apply to the C370 as with the C350 as far as tweaks/refinements being an older model and all? I'm in an 11x14 room with 8ft ceilings using Paradigm Studio 40's. I don't think power is an issue but for the small price increase would welcome any associated sonic improvements, if any. Any advice or thoughts would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
NAD C320BEE vs NAD C350
Hi audiogon guys
idlike to know which is the real difference between those 2 amps.
i know and i ve heard that 320 bee is very musical and extremely well designed and high aclaimed by experts and 350 is a bit (10w) more powerful than 320 bee but not as good in sound due to (isc) tecnology.
Also c350 is discontinnued by the way and c320 is not(why 350 is older??)
Pleas experts or owners or former ones give me an explanation and your comments
thanks
andreas
idlike to know which is the real difference between those 2 amps.
i know and i ve heard that 320 bee is very musical and extremely well designed and high aclaimed by experts and 350 is a bit (10w) more powerful than 320 bee but not as good in sound due to (isc) tecnology.
Also c350 is discontinnued by the way and c320 is not(why 350 is older??)
Pleas experts or owners or former ones give me an explanation and your comments
thanks
andreas