NAD 3020 a viable option for a quality system?


I'm on a budget, and my system has been evolving for a few years. I look for "overachieving" products; bang-for-the-buck is a big deal with me! What I don't want is to have any component which really compromises the rest of the system.
My current components:
Marantz CD-67 SE
Totem Mites (on quality stands)
Kimber Silver Streak
Kimber 4TC

I can get the "Legendary" NAD 3020 for under $100, but am wondering: Was this amp merely "good for 1980", or does it still challenge contemporary options like the current NAD's or Arcam Alpha 7R (which I can also get a good deal on).
128x128trentcanuck

Showing 1 response by kjg

I had and enjoyed a 1020B/2155 combo for many years (the 3020 separates equivalent) and think its one of the great bargains in low/mid-fi audio. However, neither of these pieces are especially fast, accurate or resolving, but rather produce a soft, warm sound that takes the edge off things and can make an inexpensive system sound wonderful. Depending on your tastes however, in a better resolving system these may not be the most complimentary pieces.

Keep in mind that the equipment is also 15 years old and was not built with the highest quality parts to begin with. Any amp you find now will likely be showing its age and won't provide quite the same quality sound it had originally. Still, the amp and preamp I had continue to be used as a bedroom system at a friend's place, so there's something to be said for the way NAD used to build things.

BTW - Both the 1020B and 3020 achieved "legendary" status because they were great pieces of low/mid end audio gear. This doesn't, however, elevate them to the level of modern high end audio equipment. They're worth having for a second system, but are a bit outmatched with today’s high resolution sources. Nevertheless, $100 is cheap enough to experiment with, so it might be worth giving it a try and see what it does with your CD player and speakers.