My Long List of Amplifiers and My Personal Review of Each!


So I have been in a long journey looking to find the best amplifiers for my martin logan montis. As you know, the match between an amplifier and speakers has to be a good "marriage" and needs to be blend exquisitely. Right now, I think I might have found the best sounding amplifier for martin logan. I have gone through approximately 34-36 amplifiers in the past 12 months. Some of these are:

Bryston ST, SST, SST2 series
NAD M25
PARASOUND HALO
PARASOUND CLASSIC
KRELL TAS
KRELL KAV 500
KRELL CHORUS
ROTEL RMB 1095
CLASSE CT 5300
CLASSE CA 2200
CLASSE CA 5200
MCINTOSH MC 205
CARY AUDIO CINEMA 7
OUTLAW AUDIO 755
LEXICON RX7
PASS LABS XA 30.8
BUTLER AUDIO 5150
ATI SIGNATURE SERIES 6005

With all that said, the amplifiers I mentioned above are the ones that in my opinion are worth mentioning. To make a long story short, there is NO 5 CHANNEL POWER AMP that sounds as good as a 3ch and 2ch amplifier combination. i have done both experiments and the truth is that YOU DO lose details and more channel separation,etc when you select a 5 channel power amplifier of any manufacturer.
My recollection of what each amp sounded like is as follows:

ATI SIGNATURE SERIES 6005 (great power and amazing soundstage. Very low noise floor, BUT this amplifiers NEEDS TO BE cranked up in order to fully enjoy it. If you like listening at low volume levels or somewhat moderate, you are wasting your time here. This amp won’t sound any different than many other brands out there at this volume. The bass is great, good highs although they are a bit bright for my taste)

NAD M25 (very smooth, powerful, but somewhat thin sounding as far as bass goes)
Bryston sst2(detailed, good soundstage, good power, but can be a little forward with certain speakers which could make them ear fatiguing at loud volumes)

Krell (fast sounding, nice bass attack, nice highs, but some detail does get lost with certain speakers)

rotel (good amp for the money, but too bright in my opinion)

cary audio (good sound overall, very musical, but it didn’t have enough oomph)

parasound halo (good detail, great bass, but it still holds back some background detail that i can hear in others)

lexicon (very laid back and smooth. huge power, but if you like more detail or crisper highs, this amp will disappoint you)

McIntosh mc205 (probably the worst multichannel amp given its price point. it was too thin sounding, had detail but lacked bass.

butler audio (good amplifier. very warm and smooth sweet sounding. i think for the money, this is a better amp than the parasound a51)

pass labs (very VERY musical with excellent bass control. You can listen to this for hours and hours without getting ear fatigue. however, it DOES NOT do well in home theater applications if all you have is a 2 channel set up for movies. The midrange gets somewhat "muddy" or very weak sounding that you find yourself trying to turn it up.

classe audio (best amplifier for multi channel applications. i simply COULDNT FIND a better multi channel amplifier PERIOD. IT has amazing smoothness, amazing power and good bass control although i would say krell has much better bass control)

Update: The reviews above were done in January 2015. Below is my newest update as of October 2016:



PS AUDIO BHK 300 MONOBLOCKS: Amazing amps. Tons of detail and really amazing midrange. the bass is amazing too, but the one thing i will say is that those of you with speakers efficiency of 87db and below you will not have all the "loudness" that you may want from time to time. These amps go into protection mode when using a speaker such as the Salon, but only at very loud levels. Maybe 97db and above. If you don’t listen to extreme crazy levels, these amps will please you in every way.

Plinius Odeon 7 channel amp: This is THE BEST multichannel amp i have ever owned. Far , but FAR SUPERIOR to any other multichannel amp i have owned. In my opinion it destroyed all of the multichannel amps i mentioned above and below. The Odeon is an amp that is in a different tier group and it is in a league of its own. Amazing bass, treble and it made my center channel sound more articulate than ever before. The voices where never scrambled with the action scenes. It just separated everything very nicely.

Theta Dreadnaught D: Good detailed amp. Looks very elegant, has a pleasant sound, but i found it a tad too bright for my taste. I thought it was also somewhat "thin" sounding lacking body to the music. could be that it is because it is class d?

Krell Duo 300: Good amp. Nice and detailed with enough power to handle most speakers out there. I found that it does have a very nice "3d" sound through my electrostatics. Nothing to fault here on this amp.
Mark Levinson 532H: Great 2 channel amp. Lots of detail, amazing midrange which is what Mark Levinson is known for. It sounds very holographic and will please those of you looking for more detail and a better midrange. As far as bass, it is there, but it is not going to give you the slam of a pass labs 350.5 or JC1s for example. It is great for those that appreciate classical music, instrumental, etc, but not those of you who love tons of deep bass.

 It is articulate sounding too
Krell 7200: Plenty of detail and enough power for most people. i found that my rear speakers contained more information after installed this amp. One thing that i hated is that you must use xlr cables with this amp or else you lose most of its sound performance when using RCA’s.

Krell 402e: Great amp. Very powerful and will handle any speaker you wish. Power is incredible and with great detail. That said, i didn’t get all the bass that most reviewers mentioned. I thought it was "ok" in regards to bass. It was there, but it didn’t slam me to my listening chair.

Bryston 4B3: Good amp with a complete sound. I think this amp is more laid back than the SST2 version. I think those of you who found the SST2 version of this amp a little too forward with your speakers will definitely benefit from this amp’s warmth. Bryston has gone towards the "warm" side in my opinion with their new SST3 series. As always, they are built like tanks. I wouldn’t call this amp tube-like, but rather closer to what the classe audio delta 2 series sound like which is on the warm side of things.

Parasound JC1s: Good powerful amps. Amazing low end punch (far superior bass than the 402e). This amp is the amp that i consider complete from top to bottom in regards to sound. Nothing is lacking other than perhaps a nicer chassis. Parasound needs to rework their external appearance when they introduce new amps. This amp would sell much more if it had a revised external appearance because the sound is a great bang for the money. It made my 800 Nautilus scream and slam. Again, amazing low end punch.

Simaudio W7: Good detailed amp. This amp reminds me a lot of the Mark Levinson 532h. Great detail and very articulate. I think this amp will go well with bookshelves that are ported in order to compensate for what it lacks when it comes to the bass. That doesn’t mean it has no bass, but when it is no Parasound JC1 either.
Pass labs 350.5: Wow, where do i begin? maybe my first time around with the xa30.8 wasn’t as special as it was with this monster 350.5. It is just SPECTACULAR sounding with my electrostatics. The bass was THE BEST BASS i have ever heard from ANY amp period. The only amp that comes close would be the jC1s. It made me check my settings to make sure the bass was not boosted and kept making my jaw drop each time i heard it. It totally destroyed the krell 402e in every regard. The krell sounded too "flat" when compared to this amp. This amp had amazing mirange with great detail up top. In my opinion, this amp is the best bang for the money. i loved this amp so much that i ended up buying the amp that follows below.

Pass labs 250.8: What can i say here. This is THE BEST STEREO AMP i have ever heard. This amp destroys all the amps i have listed above today to include the pass labs 350.5. It is a refined 350.5 amp. It has more 3d sound which is something the 350.5 lacked. It has a level of detail that i really have never experienced before and the bass was amazing as well. I really thought it was the most complete power amplifier i have ever heard HANDS DOWN. To me, this is a benchmark of an amplifier. This is the amp that others should be judged by. NOTHING is lacking and right now it is the #1 amplifier that i have ever owned.

My current amps are Mcintosh MC601s: i decided to give these 601s a try and they don’t disappoint. They have great detail, HUGE soundstage, MASSIVE power and great midrange/highs. The bass is great, but it is no pass labs 250.8 or 350.5. As far as looks, these are the best looking amps i have ever owned. No contest there. i gotta be honest with you all, i never bought mcintosh monos before because i wasn’t really "wowed" by the mc452, but it could have been also because at that time i was using a processor as a preamp which i no longer do. Today, i own the Mcintosh C1100 2 chassis tube preamp which sounds unbelievable. All the amps i just described above have been amps that i auditioned with the C1100 as a preamp. The MC601s sound great without a doubt, but i will say that if you are looking for THE BEST sound for the money, these would not be it. However, Mcintosh remains UNMATCHED when it comes to looks and also resale value. Every other amp above depreciates much faster than Mcintosh.

That said, my future purchase (when i can find a steal of a deal) will be the Pass labs 350.8. I am tempted to make a preliminary statement which is that i feel this amp could be THE BEST stereo amp under 30k dollars. Again, i will be able to say more and confirm once i own it. I hope this update can help you all in your buying decisions!


128x128jays_audio_lab
@faxer ,
Thanks for the impressive response of your repair-ability of the GT Audio speaker. I do concur, that there is not much to to wrong with these type of drivers. And the strength that you are building into them is far greater than I have ever imagined. I personally like planar di-poles for the fact that you can throw a massive amount of good amplifier power into them (me Krells) and not worry that you are going to blow the drivers. I'm glad you're getting such a good response on the sound. Kudos.
Thanks guys.
Unfortunately, the sound at Axpona was not even in the same galaxy that we had at Capital Audiofest 2019. Several factors contributed to what I consider handicaps 1. Although the GT Speakers or 93B be efficient they do like solid state high current as preferred amplification.
The speakers are voiced with Pass Labs and other high current solid-state amplifiers 
2. We were also severely limited by the fact that we could not move the furniture in that hotel room and could not get the speaker set up the way we wanted them to be set up- coupled with the fact that this was basically a closet not a true room to exhibit the speakers.
3. It was a completely different animal at Capital Audiofest we had a 35 x 27 room and had the pass XS 150’s and XS pre and XS phono pre.
not to mention the 125,000 Basis turntable.
yes the speakers do sound better with the XS gear but the speakers do sound pretty good on their own even with the $13,000 XA 60.8’s.
@whitecamaross ,
Yes, I hear you about your projection screen being in the way of large speakers. I remember tying to nudge you towards a 75" LED TV when you were building your room. It's a tough choice between Home Theater and SOTA Stereo Sound. I myself was in business with this Home dilemma. It was about 1990 when I went to Epcot Center in Orlando and experienced the Sony Home Theater system with 75" TV and a great sound system. They just sat us way closer to the TV screen. Since that day, I never recommended a projection screen system to my clients. It was mind blowing how well the sound and visuals were compared to any projection system. I know today things are much better with projection, so it amounts to what you want more in your new room. Really, good luck starting over with your new room.
whitecamaross
I concur on your observations regarding the proper amp to get what you are looking for in speaker performance. I am sure Wilsons can run on low power tubes, but if you want dynamics to die for, you need current, and lots of it on demand.
As you heard at Axpona we used the 2 models of Zanden amps...the lesser cost single pair of push pull  KT120's, 90 wpc and top of the line 65 wpc push pull KR845 model to good effect in that smaller room.
A lot of factors make or break an audio system, room size, room damping and speaker amp interface are no doubt major contributors.
When we set up those Pass Labs XS150's at CAF 2019, I was amazed by the degree which those amps gripped and controlled my planar ribbon speakers. Everything we played,  and it didn't matter...rap to Rachmaninov was presented in a way I had never heard from my speakers...that weekend was a friggin blast.
One piece in particular David Byrne "Kish" , a quirky orchestral piece absolutely floored me and the visitors we had in our room very late Saturday night. The amps and speakers never ran out of steam, the dynamics just kept building and getting louder but maintained stunningly low levels of distortion.
Rolling thunderous bass drums flooded the entire 25'x32' space.
I am now a believer in what the right amp can do for a speaker.
Steve has been babbling ever since trying to figure out how to buy those XS150's.
He has 60.8's at home and at around $13k a pair they are amazing in his 16'x27' room. They really rock like nothing I have heard at the price. 
Desmond of Pass will be sending Steve the next best thing to the XS150's...the XA160.8's. We will keep you apprised as to how well they stack up against the XS amps.
Steve and I finally got the system set up and running in his listening room after the show.  After a hard workout of 4 days of constant musical peaks in excess of 110db my speakers sound just fine. The drivers are now officially considered bullet proof and passed the test of fire.
The 60.8's sound amazing..we will see how big of a splash the 106.8's make in his room.
Stay tuned.
Greg
GTAW

Awesome Greg. I look forward to your impressions. I owned the 160.8s and although they are good, they missed the huge overhead and voltage the xs150s brought to the table. They had the sweetness but lacked the muscle and "steroid like " control of big swings of the xs. That extra chassis of the xs is certainly doing far more than just adding heat. One interesting comment I have is that I felt like the xs150 ran hotter than the xs300s. I don't know why that is to be honest but my logical explanation is that I drove the 150s harder than I drive the 300s. 
If you guys could get hands on the xs300s, I don't think anyone would leave the room..