My "audiophile" weakness(es)...ie: how the item looks, and you?.


It's all about the sound.....right?  Well, with me mostly and most always.....however I am influenced by the cosmetics of audio gear.

The Maggie 20 are impressive, as are many Martin Logan's, and tubes....the glowing of tubes does have impact beyond the glow and heat.  Still love the "looks" of my original CJ ART preamp. 

As I look at the cosmetics/looks of audio gear I do give myself much slack...I know in sports cars, furniture, art and many other things how something looks does impact my thoughts......perhaps that explains some of the very pretty women I was with that were not actually very good people.....but they did look nice.  As a p.s. the best sports cars I ever drove were not very "pretty" as they were race cars...and the "pretty" street ones were much better looking but not nearly as fast/fun to drive as those race cars. 

Have you been influenced by how audio items look?  If you have, what are some of your favorites in the "looks" department?  Thanks for your thoughts/experiences. 







whatjd

Showing 1 response by oldhvymec

I'm picky, can't be to ungy... BUT it has to be ugly enough...

Speaker LOOKs are an issue for me lately... The new speaker space ships don't appeal to me... I like a fine furniture, look.. Victorian error

Mcintosh tube gear is a great example. If you only knew how many people asked me what a MC225, 240, 275, was, through the years.
One was a young cable installer, just amazed him... You would think he would have seen one.  5 - 6 years ago...... Duno.... :-)

Regards