I do not know of the A5 but for what its worth have the relatively new M6Si. I'm very happy with it on all accounts. I don't do analog phone listening but in the case of the M6Si the specs (on paper) are on par with more expensive gear and of course can go MM or MC.
Musical Fidelity A-5: Can its sound quality compete with today's top rated integrateds?
I have seen several members asking about vintage speakers and separates. I currently own a Rogue Sphinx v.1 hybrid integrated which is a very good amp and also has a very good phono stage. Rogue has introduced v.2 version of Sphinx integrated with upgrades, that is, a lower noise floor, and much welcomed higher gain phono stage. The amp remains at 100RMS (Upgrading from a Sphinx v.1 to a v-2 cost $400 plus shipping both ways; I am on the West Coast).
I am curious if the musical Fidelity A-5 which is 250RMS. with supposedly a good phono section. My question is: Can the A-5 issued in 2004 equal or outperform the new somewhat improved Rogue Sphinx v.2 . I have heard other Musical Fidelity amp and integrateds, but not the A-5. I am considering one of Magneplanar speakers under $2000, or possibly another top rated box speaker of low efficiency, so the extra power of the A-5 would be welcomed.
However, buying a 12 year old integrated amp, the sound quality may be just typical solid state sound, that is, clean, accurate, but generally SS sound which is rarely exceptional. The Rogue Sphinx v.1 is a good sounding amp, though has some operational limitations. However, the sound falls into that category of SS quality which too often generally lacks of emotional excitement and content ( to use a somewhat vague description). Would like some feed back about the MF A-5, especially if you owned one, but moved onto newer and more expensive brand electronics. Thank you
.